LG 32LD450 LCD TV Review

We’ve had a good look at affordable small-screen HDTV offerings from other manufacturers, but LG Electronics’ lower-end LCD TVs have managed to stay off our radar. That changes now, since we’ve spent the last week or so squeezing the most out of the LG 32LD450, one of the company’s cheaper 1080p LCD televisions.

The LG 32LD450 is available for around £300, and provides you with a Full HD 1080p panel, just 2 HDMI inputs, and a DVB-T tuner for picking up Freeview Digital TV in the UK (but sadly not the few HD channels). Typically for an LG product, the 32LD450 provides extensive calibration controls which carry the Imaging Science Foundation (ISF) branding, which should allow its value to be maximised through picture fine-tuning. Let’s see how the LG 32LD450 LCD TV performs with both a basic setup, and also when it’s configured to its best.

Note: While we did not review the bigger 42-inch LG 42LD450 LCD television, there shouldn’t be any drastic difference in picture performance given nearly identical specifications.

Design

LG 32LD450

The appearance of the LG 32LD450 is entirely unremarkable, looking similar to just about every other affordable 32-inch LCD TV. The supplied table-top stand and front of the LG 32LD450 are made of gloss black plastic, with the only slightly unique feature being a long blue LED light at the bottom right, which lights up when the television is on. There were no alarming build quality issues on our review unit.

Connections

Featuring just two HDMI inputs, the LG 32LD450 is one of the few HDTVs on the market today which may introduce some connectivity issues. Combine the LG 32LD450 with an external HDTV set-top box (there’s no Freeview HD tuner, remember), an HD games console, and a Blu-ray Player, and you’ll either have to introduce an HDMI switcher into the setup, or downgrade one of the devices to the Component video connection (if possible).

There’s also one SCART terminal, a set of Composite video inputs, and a PC “VGA” input, labelled RGB. There’s also a USB socket for using the LG 32LD450’s multimedia playback features.

Rear connections on LG 32LD450
Rear: HDMI, VGA, component, SCART, RF, RS232C, & audio outs
Side: HDMI, headphone out, composite, Common Interface slot

Operation

LG’s user interface design has been widely praised, and for good reason. It features attractive, colourful, and easily legible icons and text. It’s not just a pretty face, either: the [Picture] menu allows selection of two memory banks labelled as [ISF Expert1] and [ISF Expert2]. Each of these unlocks the LG 32LD450’s full image calibration controls to allow enthusiast users and calibrators to get the absolute most out of the HDTV’s picture quality.

LG hasn’t left less tech-savvy users out in the cold, either. If you select the [Picture Wizard] setup assistant, the LG 32LD450 will display internal test patterns and guide you through setting basic picture controls such as Brightness, Contrast, Tint, Colour, and Sharpness. Calibration with a meter and measuring from the actual playback devices you’ll be using with the HD TV is still the most fool-proof strategy, but of course, not easily accessible to everyone.

[Picture] and [Expert] menus
[Picture] and [Expert Control] menus

The [Expert Control] menu features, among other self-explanatory options, control over two Noise Reduction systems. [Noise Reduction] is a temporal smoothing feature which smooths out analogue-type background noise. [Digital Noise Reduction] is aimed at reducing compression artefacts, by cutting out high frequencies in the image (which has the tendency to give it an “oil painting” look). There’s also a [Real Cinema] option, which is simply a film mode deinterlacing option (more on that during the Standard Definition section).

Next, we can choose the most appropriate [Colour Gamut] for the input or content being viewed. This comes set to “Standard” by default, which is entirely appropriate. The other options are for EBU, SMPTE and BT709 industry standards, as well as an arbritrary “Wide” option.

There is a small amount of confusion online regarding HD and SD colour gamuts, so a little history lesson might be useful to explain what these options are for. Most enthusiast users know that HDTV’s standardised colour gamut is defined in ITU Rec.709 (Rec.709 is the name of the spec in which the gamut is mentioned, not strictly the gamut itself). Some might have read online that there is a standard def colour gamut called Rec.601 – but this is misinformation. Rec.601 is not a colour gamut, but an entire specification for the Digital representation and sampling of SD video – in which colour gamut is not dictated.

The actual colour gamuts in both analogue AND digital SDTV are historically linked to the phosphor material used in TV picture tubes, and differed across territories. After decades of confusion, US production facilities settled on a standardised gamut called SMPTE-C in the 1980s, whereas European SD TV productions conform to the EBU (European Broadcasting Union) recommendation. As it happens, the EBU gamut is actually a very close predecessor to the Rec.709 gamut we use for HDTV today, and the EBU themselves state that the difference between is hardly noticeable, which is why in Europe we typically calibrate to the HDTV Rec.709 standard and leave it at that.

So, with this information, it’s obvious what the different modes are for: EBU for standard-def European sources, SMPTE-C for standard-def American or American-centric ones, and BT709 for all HDTV content. Fortunately, users don’t have to worry about manually selecting different colour gamuts on the LG 32LD450. Simply leaving this set to “Standard” will use the correct gamut at the correct time.

Calibration

Note: Our LG 32LD450 review sample was calibrated using Calman Professional, the industry-leading video calibration software.

Greyscale

By default, the LG 32LD450 pumps out an off-colour, blue-tinted picture, but selecting the [ISF Expert1] mode brings things much closer to an ideal situation. We ran some measurements to see how well the 32LD450 was doing:

Pre-calibration CCT
Pre-calibration CCT in [ISF Expert1] mode
Pre-calibration RGB Tracking
Pre-calibration RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs)

Even with the selection of [ISF Expert1], the image was still slightly lacking in red. More seriously still, the LG 32LD450 showed the common LCD flaw of having an excess of blue in shadowed areas of the image. This is a good out-of-the-box result, but the LG 32LD450 features a raft of calibration controls, so we naturally got stuck in, and started to wring every last drop of picture performance from the display.

At first, we did a 2-point Greyscale calibration. 2-point calibration is where two points (usually 20% and 80% brightness) are measured and adjusted. On most HDTV displays, all of the other points in-between will generally produce a similarly consistent tone of Grey (we call this “consistent” or “linear” Greyscale tracking). The LG 32LD450 was fairly consistent here and produced very good picture quality, but LG offer a 10-point control on this LCD TV – meaning that small inconsistencies can be flattened out with even greater accuracy. Naturally, we went all the way and used this mode to squeeze every last drop of performance out of the television:

Post-calibration CCT in [ISF Expert1] mode
Post-calibration CCT in [ISF Expert1] mode
Post-calibration RGB Tracking in [ISF Expert1] mode
Post-calibration RGB tracking and dEs in [ISF Expert1] mode

The charts certainly do the talking here. The Greyscale tracking of the LG 32LD450 was perfect after 10-point Greyscale calibration. Again, our method for achieving the above result was to do a 2-point calibration first, then to switch over to the 10-point mode and make small adjustments as necessary to clean out any remaining errors. The 10-point control also allowed us to fully remove the excess of blue that was hanging around in shadowed areas. We wish the rest of the industry would follow LG’s lead and introduce 10-point control on all HDTV models – in particular, we hope to see this level of flexibility on 3D Plasma displays, since the ones we’ve reviewed so far are having real difficulty producing naturally tinted pictures in 3D mode.

Gamma curve in [ISF Expert1] mode Gamma tracking in [ISF Expert1] mode
Gamma curve in [ISF Expert1] mode Corresponding gamma tracking

Colour

Although rightly recognised as a leader in offering calibration control, LG’s colour management system (CMS) has, for some time, only been a two-axis affair: it only offers control over the Hue and Saturation of colour gamut (top chart), but not the colour decoding, or Colour Brightness (bottom chart). Fortunately, this really didn’t matter much at all, because the LG 32LD450’s out-of-the-box colour decoding performance was one of the best we’ve ever measured: it was not really over or under-emphasising the brightness of any of the six colours.

We did manage to use the colour management controls to do minor tune-up work, especially with Cyan and Magenta, which were both very subtly pushed towards blue (albeit not by any obvious amount).

Post-calibration CIE chart in [ISF Expert1] mode
Post-calibration CIE chart with reference to HD Rec.709
Post-calibration Luminance levels in [ISF Expert1] mode
Post-calibration colour luminance (coloured bars = targets; black bars = measured values)

The end result is excellent, with there being essentially no noticeable colour errors on the LG 32LD450.

Benchmark Test Results

Dead pixels None
Screen uniformity Unevenness present, but difficult to localise
Overscanning on HDMI 0% with [Aspect Ratio] set to “Just Scan”
Blacker than black Passed
Calibrated black level 0.25 cd/m2
Black level retention Stable
Primary chromaticity Excellent
Scaling Very Good
Video mode deinterlacing Good jaggies reduction
Film mode deinterlacing Good, Passed 2:2 PAL
Viewing angle Average
Motion resolution 300
Digital noise reduction Present, optional
Sharpness Very minor forced edge enhancement or forced blurring
Luma/Chroma bandwidth Full Luma, slightly blurred Chroma *
1080p/24 capability No judder with [Real Cinema] on
Input lag 16ms in “Game Mode” compared to lag-free CRT
Full 4:4:4 reproduction No, 4:4:4 input subsampled

* “Full Luma” refers to the fact that the finest high frequency lines in a “Luma Multiburst” test pattern were visible. However, because of how the LG 32LD450’s [Sharpness] controls operate, the image is very, very subtly more blurred than on displays which do not tamper with the video. We explain in more detail in the “High Definition” section.

Power Consumption

Default [Standard] mode 88 watts
Calibrated [ISF Expert1] mode 59 watts
Standby 1 watt

Picture Performance

Black Level

LG’s LCD TVs (or their Plasmas, for that matter) have never been renowned for their deep blacks, and sure enough, this is the weakest area on the 32LD450. Once we calibrated the [Backlight] control to achieve our target 120 cd/m2 peak light output, we measured the LG 32LD450’s deepest black at 0.26 cd/m2, which is not too inspiring.

As is often the case with LCD displays, the measured black level varied across the screen surface, but in this case, the non-uniformity wasn’t really visible. We measured 0.20 cd/m2 in the corners of the screen, with the measurements rising smoothly towards the centre of the panel. Again, because the non-uniformity was gradual and spread out rather than obviously localised, this was not blatantly obvious to the eye.

Sadly, the LG 32LD450’s illuminated blacks do damage picture realism. Night scenes and actors in black suits revealed that dark areas of the screen appeared more like silky velvet than actual darkness. This is enough to distract from some of the excellent Greyscale and Colour strengths, with the entire picture lacking “punch”, in spite of the top-notch measured performance in those two areas. A good reminder, if one was needed, that contrast sits at the top of the picture quality ladder.

The viewing angle of the LG 32LD450 was also average. Though the colours stayed quite consistent, shifting to the sides of the LCD TV caused the picture to take on a more greyish tone. Unlike some of Samsung’s top-end LED LCDs or some of Sony’s older 2006 BRAVIA sets, at least there were no obvious cloudy patches visible off-axis: although there was a definite glowing, it was difficult to localise any point of it being especially brighter than its surroundings.

In other words, the performance is exactly what we expected from an affordable LG LCD TV.

Motion Resolution

The LG 32LD450 is an LCD television without an MCFI (motion-compensated frame interpolation) system (LG reserves its version, called TruMotion, for more expensive sets). With that in mind, we weren’t surprised at all to see the LG 32LD450 display around 300 lines of resolution from the FPD Benchmark Software test disc, with the finer areas of the chart (representing higher motion) becoming a greyish smudge when the chart moved. This is totally in line with our expectations, and the usual buyer’s advice applies: although low motion resolution is generally hard to detect with 24fps movies or 30fps games, it can make high motion video like sports or very fast video games somewhat blurred.

We did notice also that the black lines in the pattern left white shadow images as the pattern scrolled. This isn’t ideal, but is better than than the black lines leaving excessive streaking.

Standard Definition

It’s been a long time since we looked at one of LG’s cheaper LCD sets, so we had no idea what to expect in terms of Deinterlacing and Scaling (“Upconverting”) performance. What we saw was good, but understandably, not top-drawer.

After sending the LG 32LD450 jumping through our usual torture tests, we found that it had decent video deinterlacing performance, with a small but totally forgivable amount of jaggies making their way onto the screen, surprisingly good film cadence detection (the 2:2 test sequence passed when the [Real Cinema] option was turned on in the [Expert Control] menu), and completely acceptable scaling performance, which reminded us of the scaling seen on Philips and Sony LCD TVs with its generally sharp appearance, and mild ringing around fine lines.

We had a long look at the LG 32LD450 strutting its stuff with actual Digital TV material, and didn’t find any issues that our usual testing hadn’t already revealed. High quality SD sources (good luck finding one) looked as good as the panel allowed, and Digital TV broadcasts looked as mediocre as you would expect, through no fault of the LCD TV. LG does provide a [Digital Noise Reduction] feature which attempts to conceal compression artefacts, but like most systems of its type, it does more harm than good.

High Definition

When we first checked out some HD material on the LG 32LD450 before calibration, it was rendering the wonderfully filmic Aliens Blu-ray Disc in a fairly unappealing, edge-enhanced manner. All of the fine grain from the film scan (represented in video as high frequency texture) was made thick and obvious, with the entire image looking “greasy”. Fortunately, adjusting the LG 32LD450’s Sharpness controls allowed us to return the natural, intended look of the film, with the grain appearing fine and adding texture to the image, rather than being thickened and brought to the foreground.

Setting sharpness on the LG 32LD450 is not as easy as you might expect. In the [Expert] modes, LG offers two sharpening controls – for the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. We connected a desktop PC and also used a variety of familiar patterns in order to find the best settings for both. Unfortunately, although there is a lot of scope for adjustment, there is no “hands off” mode on the LG 32LD450, with some degree of ringing or blurring being present at all times. We eventually settled on settings of 34 and 48 (for H and V Sharpness respectively), which meant text looked slightly thickened and smudged, but at least not obviously ringy, on our computer desktop. During actual HDTV and Blu-ray Disc movie content, the tampering did result in the picture appearing slightly smoother than on other displays. It’s not a huge issue on a small screen like this, but it’s one that LG’s competitors don’t suffer from, and we really think they should just include a “hands off” sharpness option.

We did also try engaging the LG 32LD450’s “PC” Mode to defeat the sharpening. Unbelievably, when the HDMI input is labelled as “PC”, the LG 32LD450 forces the [Edge Enhancement] feature on and both Sharpness controls to “50”, and prevents the user from making any changes. This looks as bad as it sounds and basically means that the “PC” mode is completely useless for high quality video, and will likely prove irritating for actual PC use due to the white glowing around text. We can only assume that this is an error on LG’s part, since it makes no logical sense. Fortunately, the LG 32LD450 is still usable enough as a computer display outside of the “PC” viewing mode.

We also ran some benchmark tests and discovered that the LG 32LD450 does reproduce 24fps film content without any unwanted interpolation or judder, but only if you have the [Real Cinema] option turned on. We had assumed that this feature was only a film cadence detection option (largely used for SD material), but were proven wrong.

Console Gaming

Halo Reach on LG 32LD450

Gaming turned out to be excellent on this HDTV: the LG 32LD450 is yet another example of the perverse tradition of a company’s lower-end products being better for gaming than its more expensive screens. Lagging by just 16ms, we could effortlessly jump and blast our way around the environments in Halo: Reach without having to fight with the control pad. This excellent figure was measured with all of the 32LD450’s colour management and 10-point Greyscale correction enabled. If only the entire industry could manage this level of performance consistently, and give it to us on higher-end TVs!

Conclusion

The LG 32LD450 is a relatively inoffensive 32″ LCD TV. There’s enough to like about it, but its average black level is enough to stop it from getting a gleeful recommendation. For the same amount of money, Samsung offers the LE32C530 which features an SPVA panel (depending on where you live and which variant you get!) with much richer blacks, and consequently, a punchier image. It also has an extra HDMI input.

We could almost have predicted this result based on the “LG” branding, but scientific measurements have confirmed the situation: the company has, once again, produced a HDTV that can be calibrated within an inch of its life and produce highly accurate video, but still can’t achieve outright greatness. It’s a shame also that its lack of a “hands off” mode means that its pictures are very subtly more smeared (or more ringy, depending on your “Sharpness” setting) than the competition: there is no way to get a purely unadulterated image.

However, the LG 32LD450 has plenty of advantages to boast about: flawless Greyscale tracking resulting in completely neutral, tint-free video, no colour errors worth mentioning, and also no detectable input lag. These points won’t be enough to distract movie lovers from the slightly greyish blacks (assuming movie lovers would be considering a smaller screen like this one, anyway), but we imagine the LG 32LD450 will find favour with many gamers, as a result of its lightning-fast video processing, which results in console gaming feeling fluid and fun.

Qualified Recommendation

50 comments

  1. Hi Great review.

    I have taken the plunge and bought the 32LD690 model over LE32C530 due to the 100 hz and extra toys at a small differential in price. I am currently lost within the expert calibration settings and would be very grateful if you can post your final calibration settings for the above model which I can try out.

  2. Nice review. Is there any difference in panel type? Like the samsung tv’s they all have different panels (auo etc).

    Also does this tv make any background noise? I had a samsung tv and it emitted a high-pitched electronic buzz from the back of the panel, this is very annoying in a small room at night.

  3. Nice review, please send me the calibrated settings. Thx.

  4. great review…the circle is complete…sony 32ex400, samsung 32c530, and now LG 32LD450

    i can’t make up my mind now between samsung c530 v LG ld450 :(

    how important is black level??
    this LG model has better/wider viewing angle compared to samsung c530?

  5. The LG viewing angle is definitely better. The colours don’t tint as much from the sides.
    Black level is important. It’s the one thing holding this TV back.

    Sorry to everyone else, but I didn’t save my calibrated settings this time.

  6. Mootje: I don’t think there is a panel lottery situation with LG. This TV also doesn’t make any stand-out operating noise.

  7. I’m having a bit of a dilemma here. I’m looking for a TV, and have decided between either the Samsung C530 or C580. My main use would be for gaming (Xbox and Wii, so scaling would be important for the wii) with some blu ray on the side. Then, I came across this TV. Which would you recommend as the best out of the 3?

    Would the Samsung’s have a better default picture, as it seemed that the LG needed some calibration to get the most out of it, while the Samsung’s were closer to the mark, and because you never saved your settings (And I’ve never calibrated a TV in my life) I’d be completely stuck on what to do in that regard.

    Have you already returned the TV? No chance of a quick whip up of settings? D:

  8. Hey Lewis – it’s gone I’m afraid. The “Expert” default settings (other than Sharpness) are not too bad.
    Regarding the Samsungs, we reviewed them here:

    http://hdtvtest.co.uk/news/samsung-le32c530-le40c530-20100813815.htm
    http://hdtvtest.co.uk/news/samsung-le40c580-le32c580-20100728791.htm

  9. Hey,

    Ah, that’s unfortunate. I did read those reviews, but it starts to get confusing after a while at which one will be the best. The chaps over as AVSforum like to recommend the C530, but I’ve never heard of the LG from them before, so don’t know if I should take that as some sort of sign. :P

  10. Either of the Samsungs would be my recommendation.

  11. Well, better end this quick then, It’s true that the C580 has some issues with 24p blu ray playback? If that’s the case, should I just grab the C530?

  12. Sounds like it!

  13. Hi, I’m from Germany and I’m looking for a gaming TV plus i want to watch football. I just sent my Panasonic TX-L 32 s20 back, because the input lag was bothering me. I was thinking about 42 TX-P S 20 as well, but i only have 2 m viewing distance, so it’s probably too big. Furthermore i read on hdtelevizija.com, that the european model of the s20 plasma was measured at 40 ms input lag. So right now, only TVs left are this LG (blur?), the samsung c530 (panel lottery and maybe blurry?) and the philips 32 PFL 5605, which is supposed to have input lag around 20ms according to avforums and . Which one would u recommend and do you know if the input lag data on the philips 32 PFL 5605 is correct?

  14. does the Samsung c530 emits buzzing noise too?

  15. Oh David, have you seen these Sharp hdtv model LC-40L550M, LC-40L500M in your country? Seems not a lot of people did a review on it.
    Hope to see you reviewing it ; )

  16. Those don’t seem to be available here. Are they for Asia?

  17. Hi tom, you should check out http://www.hifi-forum.de
    The Pana S20 is very good for video gaming, though the image retention/potential burn-in would bother me.

  18. @David, i guess so they are for asia perhaps….but its not available in japan though..

    anyway is it true samsung c530 has buzzing noise?

  19. Not that I know of.

  20. What a terrible black level

  21. Hey David, a quick question: the panel reviewed was the famous ISP from LG or the not-so-good AUO’s panel?

    Thanks for the review!

  22. Your review of the LG 32LD450 mentions that ” the LG 32LD450 is still usable enough as a computer display.” Computer text display is an important feature to me (I need a big screen for text display to compensate for failing eyesight).

    My experience with LG is basd on a 32″ LCD monitor that they produced years ago which is still doing just fine. It has DVI input (HDMI was still rare and “high-end” at that time) and 720p resolution . I use it as a computer disply and it does a good job displaying text but the monitor won’t serve the dual purpose I have in mind and weighs too much for the location I have in mind. (Dual purpose means as a monitor and for blu-ray display)..

    Is your comment on the LG 32LD450’s suitability as a monitor based on using the TV’s VGA input or using a computer’s digital video output? If the latter, what video card did ou use and did were you runnign HDMI output or DVI output into the TV’s HDMI port? You mention that the TV’s “PC mode” was useless but it’s not clear whetrher you did any special tweaks to enhance the 32LD450 as computer display as opposed to its use with other sources. Finally, when you say Does “usable enough” mean pretty good or just mediocre? Thanks

  23. Hi, I have done my own Input Lag tests on these TVs:

    For reference: Samsung SyncMaster 215TW, S-PVA panel, input lag of 33 – 50 ms
    40″ Full HD 2009 model: Samsung LE40B650, A-MVA panel (AA03), input lag of 50 ms

    32″ Full HD 2010 models:

    LG 32LD450 (unknown panel type – not ‘W’ in S/N), input lag of 17 – 33 ms
    Panasonic TX-L32S20, S-IPS Alpha panel, input lag of 33 ms
    – this TV did not accept FHD native panel resolution over VGA, so was tested at 1024×768
    Samsung LE32C530, S-PVA panel, input lag of 17 – 33 ms
    Samsung LE32C550, A-MVA panel, input lag of 33 ms

    The lowest input lag was 1 frame almost all the time on LG 32LD450. I will add reference TN panel to the test in next days.

    Here is the video: http://bit.ly/fw2KcY

  24. hey David, nice review. In future reviews, would you be able to test the input lag in “game” mode, and not in game mode aswell? if people can avoid it, they really dont want to use “game” mode because it reduces picture quality from all of the picture processing that gets disabled when “game” mode is on. the tv reviews on this site back in 2008/2009 measured both input lag times in “game” mode and without, and was really helpful and more informative. do you think we would be able to get that back? thanks…

  25. Hi David, how do i access service menu etc to see my usage hours, in case i was sold a display unit. Thanks!

  26. Hi David, how do i access service menu to check usage hour?

    How do i access the Expert picture setup? i cant seem to find it…: (

  27. hi david, how do i access service menu to check usage hours?

    how do i access expert picture setup? can’t seem to find it…

  28. Hey everyone,
    Your comments seemed to get stuck in the spam filter, not sure why.

    @Alex C: I couldn’t see any visible sticker through the back of the TV, so sadly can’t give you an answer.

    @John Noller: I didn’t test the VGA input. With DVI->HDMI, I didn’t do any special tweaks beyond what I would do with normal video signals. I experimented with the Sharpness controls to minimise ringing.

    “Usable enough” is probably best read as “tolerable if you can get a good deal on this TV”. There are many others that show video signals (including those from a computer) untampered-with, so I would look around.

    @jezza: I could do that, but in this case, there was no difference in quality with Game Mode on or off. If there was, I would definitely mention it.

    @durchtecknik: Unfortunately, I don’t have the service menu code for LG displays here.
    Expert Mode is accessed by selecting the “ISF Expert1” or “Expert2” mode, and then go to the bottom of the picture settings list.

  29. @torhal
    I’m familiar with hifi-forum and i know the s20 seems to be a good TV:
    Problem concerning the input lag is, they always refer to the 16ms measured on this site. But over here they testet the 50″ version wy I would buy the 42″. Only input lag test i found for the 42s20 was on this croatian website and it was measured 40 ms, which would be way too much for me since i already returned the TX-L s20 due too its input lag. They also say that the european s20 is different from the UK one. Plus there was some guy in avsforum who tested the german 42s20 with 33ms, which would still be too high for me.

    Sorry for getting OT but i really need some help with this

  30. Ok, manage to find isf expert mode in picture button. But i notice during playback of videos (i was using USB thumbdrive) it doesn’t have any effect on the expert mode. I pressed the Q.Menu, to see the contrast, brightness etc – its the default/modified values when u press the AV Mode button.

    So what does setting isf expert really does? The AV Mode has no selection for isf Expert…is either Off, vivid, sport, game, cinema (each with its own set values – which is different from my isf expert values i setup)

    Please help…

  31. Great review but I would really appreciate you sending me a copy of the final calibration settings for the LG 42LD450

  32. Great review, i have this tv in the 42″ version and its awsome and i would really appreciate a copy of the calibration settings for the LG 42LD450 or LG 32LD450

    Thank you

  33. Hi,

    Could you send a calibraton copy over my way? Helpfull review, just missing the calibrations at the end!

    Adam

  34. Hello!!

    Nice review, do you have the calibration data for it?

    /Mats

  35. Why would you want someone else’s TVs calibration settings? That defeats the whole idea of calibration.

  36. Can you send me too the calibration setting for LG 32Ld450. Will appreciate it very much.

  37. nice one, would appreciate if u can send me the calibrations settings LG 32Ld450 u.k

  38. Great review! Can you please send me the calibration settings? Thank you!

  39. Hey david, great review. I am stuck between this tv and the Samsung LN32C530. (American- is this what explains the difference in LE32C530 and LN32C530??)

    I can purchase this LG for 370 american dollars and the Samsung for 463$. Is it 100$ better than this LG??? It seems the black reproduction and more available inputs are obvious plusses. I, however interested in tv’s, hold no real knowledge to fine tune the black, colour, etc. Would I be able to fine tune enough to distinguish the differences that you have found in the two tv’s? Thank you, again, great reviews.

  40. You’ve got it right: the LE prefix denotes a European model, whereas the LN prefix is reserved for a North American model.

    Because I’m the most demanding of video enthusiasts, I would say that the Samsung is worth every cent of the $100 extra over the LG, if only because of the former’s superior blacks (which should be reasonably obvious even if both TVs are uncalibrated) that lays the foundation for a punchy image.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  41. Richard Burroughs

    Thank you Vincent, just placed the order. You definitely have assured me I am getting the best for my money.

    Thank you,
    Richard

  42. Hello! Im thinking if the LG 32Ld450 is very good for gaming so it doesent lag alot. It cost about 285 pound in sweden now so its a good price. Of course i will enjoy it as an tv to at the same time.

    And if you can sent me to the calibration settings to this tv.

    Thank you.
    Mark

  43. Excellent review

    The most comprehensive review on the web in my opinion.

    Please could you send me the final calibration settings, I would be very grateful thankyou.

    Chris

  44. Good review could you please send me the calibration settings for the LG 32ld450

  45. i would like to thank you for the great detailed review, can you please send me a copy of the calibration settings?

  46. Thanks for the great review, could you please forward me a copy of the calibration settings?

  47. Can someone post the calibrations for 42ld450 or send me the calibration settings?

    sounds great.

  48. Can anyone help? I’m looking for a 32″ LCD that has:

    1. Good motion performance for non-100Hz
    2. Acceptable/v. good natrual contrast and blacks without dynamic dimming
    3. Good sound quality
    4. No overscan on HD and good SD performance
    5. A “hard” power switch
    6. At least 2 rear HDMI ports

    I’m used to mid/top end Philips LCD sets which do all of that ^ but I’m now looking in to either Panasonic LCD or possibly LG for a 32″ set in my own flat. Is that a good choice?

  49. Can someone post the calibrations for 42ld450 or send me the calibration settings? please would like to try them out

  50. Hello,
    I thought i would comment on one of the pro of this Tv. I own this Tv and image quality really depends on what type of material you use, I feel that if you use SD material and broadcasted Digital Tv material (freeview) the cadence detection of film material and upscaling is excellent, and i feel that in general the processing , upscaling, etc is really good. I think that if you use it for freeview and SD material the less punchier picture due to weak black is less important than its generally excellent signal processing.So if you use Sd signals i would recommend this Tv however only if you mostly use HD signals maybe the above mentioned samsung would have the edge.

calibration

Professional TV Calibration Service

Own this (or any other) TV? Want to get the best picture quality? Book us in to calibrate your set. Affordable price... get a quote now.

Close