Panasonic TX-L32G10 Review

Despite being a strong advocate of plasma display technology, Panasonic has continued to release LCD televisions to cater for buyers who are unable to make room for larger-sized plasmas. 6 weeks ago, no less than 7 new LCD ranges (the C10, X10, X15, S10, G10, G15, and V10 series) were launched at the Panasonic Convention 2009 in Amsterdam; today, we’ll have a proper look at the smallest model in the G10 LCD series, the 32-inch Panasonic TX-L32G10.

Besides a true HD native screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 (though it’s debatable whether you can fully appreciate this on a 32″ screen from normal seating distances), another main selling point of the Panasonic TX-L32G10 is its integrated Freesat tuner. Freesat, of course, is the UK free-to-air digital satellite TV service that lets you watch high-definition content on certain channels (BBC HD, ITV HD, Luxe HD) without having to pay for a subscription.

Note: The specific model we reviewed was the Panasonic TX-L32G10B… the character “B” appended to the end of the model number refers to the 3-pin-plug British version.

Design

Panasonic TX-L32G10

From its polished black bezel and boxy shape, to the biconvex silver strip that separates the logo and the subtly curved bottom border of the panel, the TX-L32G10 LCD HDTV does not deviate too much from Panasonic’s solid if unspectacular design philosophy. Whereas its predecessor (the TX-32LZD81) sported a pre-attached cuneiform pedestal stand, the one that comes with the Panasonic TX-L32G10 has an oval base, does not swivel, and is packaged separately inside the shipping box.

Connections

Rear connections on Panasonic TX-L32G10
Rear: 3 x HDMI, VGA, component, 2 x Scarts, aerial, Freesat (not shown), LAN, audio outs
Side connections on Panasonic TX-L32G10
Side: HDMI, S-video, composite, CI slot, SD card slot, headphone out

Calibration

Greyscale

Just like all Panasonic consumer-grade flat screen televisions we’ve reviewed to date, the TX-L32G10 lacks white balance controls in its user menu for full greyscale calibration, so we’ve had to make do one of the three [Colour Balance] presets (“Cool“, “Normal” and “Warm“). As expected, [Colour Balance] “Warm” in “Cinema” [Viewing Mode] came closest to D65 industry standard:

CCT
CCT of [Colour Balance] “Warm” in [Cinema] mode
RGB tracking
RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs) with [Colour Balance] “Warm”

There remained a tinge too much red in the greyscale, but thankfully, casual users generally shouldn’t notice this subtle degree of deviation in day-to-day viewing.

Colours

CIE chart
Panasonic TX-L32G10 CIE chart with reference to HD Rec. 709

The colour gamut on our Panasonic TX-L32G10 sample unit came reasonably close to high-definition Rec. 709 reference. Green primary was slightly oversaturated, but at least hue was aligned… an improvement from the wildly oversaturated and bluish green primary colour point on most Panasonic plasmas we’ve tested. Unfortunately, we detected some red push (a colour decoding error which cannot be inferred from the CIE diagram alone) on the Panasonic TX-L32G10, which – together with the deviated yellow and (to a lesser extent) magenta secondary colour points – will no doubt impair the realism of skin tones.

Benchmark Test Results

Dead pixels None
Screen uniformity Excellent
Overscanning on HDMI 0% with [Picture Overscan] set to “Off
Blacker than black Passed
Black level Average
Black level retention Stable in “Cinema” [Viewing Mode]
Primary chromaticity Very good
Scaling Good
Video mode deinterlacing Good; effective jaggies reduction
Film mode deinterlacing Failed 3:2 and 2:2 cadences in all resolutions
Viewing angle Excellent for an LCD TV (120-130°)
Motion resolution [Intelligent Frame Creation] “Max”: 850; “Mid”: 900; “Off”: 250
Digital noise reduction Acceptable at baseline
Sharpness Very mild non-defeatable edge enhancement
1080p/24 capability (PS3) Accepts 1080p/24 video signal; no telecine judder
Input lag (rel. to Samsung F96) 0ms in “Game” [Viewing Mode]; 15ms otherwise

Power Consumption

Default “Normal” [Viewing Mode] 91 watts
Calibrated “Cinema” [Viewing Mode] 78 watts
Standby <1 watt

Picture Performance

Black Level

Although the advanced IPS-alpha panel on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 HDTV excelled at delivering wide viewing angles (for an LCD TV), blemishless screen uniformity and smear-free motion, its Achilles’ heel was always going to be in the critical area of black-level performance, which is of course not helped by Panasonic’s persistent omission of backlight control from their LCD televisions (only in the UK… the US versions do offer backlight adjustment control).

In “Cinema” [Viewing Mode], calibrated black level on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 measured at a distinctly average 0.26 cd/m2. Some dynamic dimming wizardry (e.g. by switching the [Viewing Mode] to “Standard“) can lower this to an impressive 0.04 cd/m2 (achievable only when the content displayed on screen is totally black), but of course, gamma/image contrast, shadow detail and highlights will suffer as a result of the fluctuating nature of this picture processing method.

Gamma in [Cinema] mode Gamma in [Standard] mode
Gamma in [Cinema] mode Gamma in [Standard] mode

Motion Resolution

Using Chapter 31 of the “FPD Benchmark Software For Professional” test disc as our reference, we recorded a motion resolution of 900 on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 with [Intelligent Frame Creation] set to “Mid“. After the Sony Z4500 which boasts 200Hz Motionflow technology, this is the joint second highest (with the Philips 9632) among all the LCD televisions we have tested to date. Also impressive was how clean and halo-free the motion interpolations were.

Paradoxically, cranking [Intelligent Frame Creation] up to “Max” actually dropped the Panasonic TX-L32G10’s motion resolution to 850, due to the introduction of some more undefeatable edge enhancement which obscured the finer lines.

Intelligent Frame Creation 24p Smooth Film
[Intelligent Frame Creation] [24p Smooth Film]

Disabling [Intelligent Frame Creation] further reduced motion resolution to 250 – the norm for LCD panels not equipped with MCFI (motion-compensated frame interpolation) technology. [24p Smooth Film] – a menu option which only presents itself when the Panasonic TX-L32G10 is fed with 1080p/24 video signal – had no effect on motion resolution.

Standard Definition

The Panasonic TX-L32G10 LCD HDTV smoothened jagged edges effectively for video-based material, but failed to detect 3:2 and 2:2 cadences (over 480i and 576i respectively) for film mode deinterlacing, which means that film-based content such as movies and American dramas will be tarnished with deinterlacing artefacts like moire and line twitter. Whether or not these artefacts will be visible to you depends on your viewing distance (the farther you are, the less likely you’ll see them), any confounding factors (a low bit-rate broadcast will present other problems which are more noticeable), and your own ability to recognise these deinterlacing artefacts in the first place.

Of course, you can easily sidestep the Panasonic TX-L32G10’s deficiency in film-based deinterlacing by feeding the television with progressive video signal from a competent device (i.e. letting your DVD player perform the deinterlacing).

Standard-def images from the inbuilt tuners appeared slightly flat and “filtered”, possibly due to hardcoded MPEG noise reduction which inadvertently blurred away some genuine fine details on top of undesirable MPEG compression artefacts. This is a shame, because the upscaling/ upconversion quality on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 LCD TV was actually quite good: when piped through HDMI at 576p, decent SD DVDs looked sufficiently sharp and detailed on the TX-L32G10 without too much ringing.

Because of the aberrated yellow secondary colour point and mild red push, flesh tones on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 flat screen television struggled to convince. Setting [Colour Balance] to “Normal” alleviated the problem somewhat, but of course this would bump greyscale in excess of 6500K which, at the end of the day, is still preferable to sickly skin tones.

High Definition

Switch to HD content, and naturally things looked a whole lot better, thanks largely to sharper detail from increased resolution, and richer colours from greater tonal depth.

If you already have a Sky dish installed, or stay in an apartment connected to a communal satellite dish, then the Freesat tuner on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 will provide you with the cheapest (especially pertinent in the current credit crunch) source of high-definition content you can find in the United Kingdom. Sure, only a couple of HD channels are available at the moment, but trust us, the few occasions when you can feast your eyes on HD sport broadcasts that are sharply detailed and free of mosquito noise will make it entirely worthwhile.

Forgetting Sarah Marshall

Freesat aside, the Panasonic TX-L32G10 HDTV also dealt with 1080p/24 video signal fed from a Sony PS3 impeccably: we saw no evidence of telecine judder when watching Forgetting Sarah Marshall (Blu-ray) even with [24p Smooth Film] set to “Off“. Activating this feature would stabilise the 24p flicker (most visible on vertically scrolling text), but introduce a mild video-like effect which, to be fair, was much more subtle than most of the dejuddering processing found on other flat panel televisions.

Mila Kunis

Compared to other HDTVs boasting deeper blacks, colours on the Panasonic TX-L32G10 LCD television didn’t really leap off the screen, but remained natural enough to satisfy. Although there persisted a tiny trace of non-defeatable edge-enhancement even with [Sharpness] set to minimum, the Panasonic TX-L32G10 (with [Picture Overscan] disabled) portrayed fine detail crisply. However, unless you’re sitting less than 4 feet away, we think that a full HD resolution of 1920×1080 is probably an overkill for a screen of this size (i.e. you’ll find it difficult to appreciate the difference between this and a HD ready resolution of 1366×768 on a 32-inch screen).

Console Gaming

With “Game” [Viewing Mode] engaged (this will disable [Intelligent Frame Creation]), the Panasonic TX-L32G10 offered good gaming response – its measured input lag was on par with our resident Samsung F96 reference. Using any other [Viewing Mode] besides “Game” would add 15ms to the input lag.

Conclusion

Pros

  • Inbuilt Freesat tuner
  • [Intelligent Frame Creation] delivers clean and clear motion
  • Lowish input lag
  • Wide viewing angle (for an LCD TV)
  • Excellent screen uniformity

Cons

  • Average black-level performance unless dynamic dimming employed (which will compromise image contrast and shadow detail)
  • Non-existent film mode deinterlacing
  • SD pictures from inbuilt tuners can look slightly flat and filtered
  • Mild red push

Summary

While its ordinary black level prevents us from recommending it for critical viewing, the Panasonic TX-L32G10 LCD may appeal as a daytime or bedroom/study/kitchen TV especially to gamers (lowish input lag), sports fans (clean and clear motion), and those who wish to enjoy Freesat HD content without forking out for a separate box.

Qualified Recommendation

48 comments

  1. Hello,
    thank you for your articles, I’m glad you’re back.
    This Panasonic with LCD + your Best HDTVs Top 6 – I was just wondering, if plasma tvs are loosing on the battlefield with lcds. When I look at your top 6, there is only one plasma Pioneer and the rest is lcd tvs. Is it because you review more lcd tvs rather than plasma ones? When I look at the summary of all reviews during the past year, it’s 2:1 to lcds. Or is it because lcd tvs are just better these days? I’m undecided buyer who just want to pick the right tv.
    Thanks for any comments

  2. LCD TVs are slowly but surely winning the flat screen HDTV war (vs plasma) in terms of market share. After Pioneer withdrew from the plasma market (and LG rumoured to be following suit in the near future), Panasonic and Samsung are the only plasma manufacturers left shifting significant volume.

  3. LCD TVs are winning the market share – do you think it is right? Are today’s LCD HDTVs really so much better than plasma TVs or is it just a “fashion”, just people buying cool stuff and companies making more money on it, because it is cheaper to manufacture it? We have many examples from the past that worse (or not necessarily better) solutions pushed back its better rivals just because of better marketing…

  4. rodney donnell

    to be honest i think its like most other tech’s in our homes being that 99% of people are retarded and will choose cheap dirt over quality.

    its about price, when someone sees a 42 inch tv at 400 pounds in the paper from some weird names nobody they will normally buy into that tech.

    the same goes for idiot salesmen who push people away from plasma.for me lcd sucks, i had a trial of the samsung 9 series and well eww

    gamma flicker on games
    average blacks
    uneven backlights

    if only pioneer had reshaped thier business and merged somehow as the panasonic plasma retail arm or something.slim it down into 3 models,42,50,60 inch and try to sell at the same price panasonic sell thier plasmas’s at.

    they would of been top dog in my opinion and sold more tv’s.how any company can charge a premium and have so many models and still make money is beyond me!

  5. rodney donnell

    now vincent how about a review of the panasonic G10 plasma?

    pretty please!

  6. I have a simillar opinion. There is so much bullsh*t talk about plasmas that is supposed to scary people away. I almost fell for that, too. But when I look and the reviews here, the best TVs are LCD ones. So I wonder.

    I join the request for G10 review, Vincent, please…

  7. +1 for the neopdp g10 review …

  8. Why would this model not have back light control?

    Is it to keep the cost down or it doesn’t really need it?

  9. And +1 for Samsung PS50B650 review! looking forward to …

  10. Thank you for your review, I have come here as a last resort, and I am sure once you have read this you will think I am a complete muppet, if so, then so be it, I have read a few reviews on home entertainment equipment and all seem to be the same, full of technical Bullshit. I do not want to know about average black level performance or dynamic dimming or even non existent film mode deinterlacing, your review is enough to put any one off buying this product. so how about occassionally doing a comparison with a normal TV for example a Panasonic bog standard wide screen TV, maybe something like TX-28DTX1 which a lot of people including myself still have in their living rooms.(by the way this is a cathode ray tube) eg: well we all know an LCD will take up less space and just maybe look better when switched off. But how does the picture compare and the sound quality, if too loud. does the case vibrate and distort. what you are doing at the moment is giving a review on something a good many people Know nothing about, it seems to be a little like the old Sterio or Dolby days, (you have to get this or that frequency or modulation spec) what they didn’t tell you, was the fact the human ear can not differentiate between some of these, and so we all wasted our money,yet again) So before I go to my nearest MEGA super store to spend the best past of £1000 hard earned cash on a LCD TV, and probably be confronted by a sixteen your old pimple sales person who gives me a demonstration on a badly tuned and set up TV, although admittedly the sales peson seems to know more about it than I do, but can not answer any questions how ever simple, we are then supposed to make a decision on this bad information. Having said all this an expert opinion would be really usefull (Down Scaled of course) eg: I am buying a toaster, does the toast look like toast? does the toast taste like toast? what difference will I Notice? or should I just buy a Samsung! Thankyou.

  11. I would also like to agree with James Salt ,iam realy interested in this tv for the kitchen but all your review seems to do is talk about blacks green and grey scale in a very high tech way. Granted you do say the tv is good for a kitchen and that is all i can understand from your review. Some of my questions are does the tele look good when switched off,how does the remote control look and feel and is it easy to use,is the tv easy to set up straight from the box,your picture shows a cam slot on the side whats it for ? because this a freesat tv and should be free. Your pic shows a sd card slot ,what is this for?? can you put a movie on the card and watch it on the tv ,or is it just jpeg pics from a camera.The pic also shows an ethernet port ,what is this for? These are just some basic questions that have come to mind based on your pictures.If anything your review has now left me with more questions then answers,and i feel the least you could do is give it a rate from 1-10 or some stars so we could easily compare it to other televisions.

  12. Any tv is good for kitchen. If it fits there and costs the right amount, go for it. Internet is full of stupid reviews that tell you nothing about black level etc., so you see no diffs among the tvs after reading them. This site is supposed to give us expert reviews and we like it that way. For simple reviews go anywhere else.

  13. jakub you miss my point,all i did was google the tv and unfortunately for me this review pops up first. I feel only 2% are interested in this type of review and the tv manufacturers dont care what you think and dont care about that 2% of sales.The other 98% want to know about the functions and want to know what they are getting for their money,i didnt google colour scales and i dont want to spend £2000 on a tv because it has a nice dark black (big deal) when a £892 set has a list of functions as long as my arm but blacks dont quite match your scale. What is the point of a review if it dont review more than one item,colour. To be fair he seems to have done a good job and put a lot of effort into reviewing his colours,but iam in the 98% of normal people who dont have a clue what it all actually means.Manufacturers have to make products within peoples budgets and if a cheaper tv is only black instead of jet black so be it,iam in the 98% who can live with that.

  14. Stewart Pinkerton

    James/Paddy,

    This is a (top-class!) technical website for enthusiasts, if it doesn’t give you what you want, then don’t read it!

    You can compare facilities and features on most of the shop websites such as Currys and Comet, and whether a TV set looks good *to you* isn’t something anyone else can tell you. I think the Honda Civic is a real dog, others think it looks really good. If you want a really simple piece of advice – buy a Samsung or a Sony, whichever has the features you want and looks good to you. Both have excellent picture quality and are easy to use, so you can’t go wrong.

  15. when will you do a review of the Panasonic TX-P42X10B? Can’t wait.

    Thanks :-)

  16. Paddy if you don’t think nice dark black aren’t important when buying a TV thats almost a grand then more fool you. I don’t understand half the jargon they are talking about but I know that black is important. It doesn’t matter what resolution it is, what the SD slot or any other gubbins do, if the blacks aren’t deep then they look washed out and grey. Dark movies like Batman need deep blacks so that you can differentiate between the shades of black otherwise you might as well watch it on a SD TV..

  17. what does ‘lowish input lag’ mean? Does it mean it’s really 0 ms as stated in the test results? If so ‘lowest’ would be far more descriptive than ‘lowish’. And it would be great news to gamers.

    However what it really sounds like is that you couldn’t be bothered to properly measure input lag and therefore are unsure of what range of input lag there actually was or how does it compare to previous gaming oriented sets like sharp’s and some of the sonys.

    Lazy stuff. Please bear in mind than while you and some others may not give a damn about lag IT IS IMPORTANT to gamers. I for one, don’t give a damn about standard definition interlacing artifacts yet that topic is always covered in exhaustive detail in every of you reviews.. ‘Lowish input lag’… maybe next time you could elaborate just a bit, for the sake of us silly nitpicking gamers? I for one will be thankful..

  18. SORRY Stewart /Jakub this site is not for the likes of me its all way above my head.I only bought my first lcd tv last year and its a sony kdl 46x i never had a plasma. It was expensive but it does have a nice dark black and i just presumed all tvs would look close enough to this,only reason i bought such a dear tv was because i felt it was the best loking in the shop.One important thing i have now learnt from this site is i dont want this panasonic, and form looking around iam going to wait until late May when the panasonic tx-l32v10 is launched because of its extra features.

  19. Did I miss it or what? Did I read absolutely no comment on the Ethernet connection?

  20. Thank you for this superb review. I am at the end of the diving board, ready to jump in and buy an LCD TV. Having looked at other people’s, and watched several in many shops, I am astounded that Mr and Mrs Gen. Public will put up with such awful, out of focus, wierd-coloured displays. I happened to be watching a game of snooker on a friend’s set. The moment the green ball was hit, it almost disappeared into a fuzzy blob. John Parrot’s smart hairstyle disappeared into grey fuzz when he turned his head!! So, I have been trawling the net for comment and information, and it looks, from what I can glean from all the information that, for this level of expense, my hyper-critical eyes may find this model acceptable?

  21. This is an excellent review on the picture of this TV, but you have completely FAILED TO MENTION THE SOUND! Which is absolutely terrible!

    I have worked as an AV installer for 9 years, and this has the worst sound I have ever heard from a stereo TV! The speakers are underneath the set, pointing directly downwards. They sound distant, tinny and echoey.

    Why have you chosen not to mention such an important thing?

  22. Michael Kelly

    I have the 37″ version of this TV for 3 days now and am absolutely stunned by the quality! HD images are superb and SD is very good. I haven’t set up the freesat yet but can’t wait!

  23. is this better than lgs freesat offering? what about iplayer=tvod/etc over the ethernet connection, thats what i really want to know about? if it has bluetooth can you use a keyboard with trackpad to access ”basic” web services aswell? or dlna media streaming from say a western digital mybook?

    right idea, lot of questions though….

  24. How on earth do I get Sky to work tho??? Salesman said just plug cable from dish into the satelliate connection at back of tv….it doesn’t work. What about the Sky box with the card in it… is that obsolete as far as this telly is concerned???
    Any help greatfully received!
    L

  25. I’ve just bought one of these having only had a CRT before and I’m really disappointed. I’m only watching standard definition (SD) at the moment and but keep seeing distortions on the picture. Some things look ok but some things look terrible. I watched the film ’28 days later’ from a cable channel last night and found the actors faces kept distorting. A sort of ‘ripple’ effect happened when their faces moved. I don’t know if this sort of thing happens on all LCD’s or if it’s just this model. I wonder if it’s the ‘film deinterlacing’ problem mentioned in the review. The review says it’s possible to overcome this by ‘feeding the television with progressive video signal from a competent device’. Can anyone recommend something suitable (including make and model as I really don’t know much about this stuff)??? Also, does anyone know a way to resolve the ‘flat and filtered’ problem for SD also mentioned in the review?
    Thank you.

  26. I really need advice about choosing a TV that serves both as TV receiver (terrestrial & Freesat) and as a display for my laptop (which i plan to keep under the TV and operate via a wireless keyboard from my sofa).
    The Panasonic TX-L32G10 sounds just what i need – but is it ?
    I’m not knowledgeable, technically, and need to understand if this TV is a good choice. Please can someone help with a few simple words ??

  27. Paddy, you seem to think that the entire internet should be written up in such a way that will convenience google search results for you and you alone! I for one would like as much info as possible about a product costing me a month’s wages! If you want any old telly, then do your google, and buy one for £300. If you want top quality viewing pleasure, then you will need to research what’s available.
    Thank you so much for the in-depth review- I’m glad it came up in my search results.
    Looking around my (proper local) TV shop and comparing all the latest Panasonics, Sonys and Samsungs, ,the best looking picture in HD I saw was on The Panasonic TXP42G10 for about £1200. My daughter agreed.
    I saw the TX-L32G10 which was running a 50Hz vs 100Hz splitscreen demo.
    Clearly, the 100Hz is great!
    The salesman showed me the 37″ in SD as well as HD and I must say it looked good, but the 42″ plasma really stuck out in overall picture quality *despite it’s greater size* : it has high contrast like the LCD’s but non-jagged pixels like an a good quality old CRT.
    So even though it’s £400 more, I have decided on the 42″ plasma.
    I hope that is useful for someone who i wondering plasma vs LCD.
    The drawback is higher power consumption.

  28. Hello everyone. I’m an out-and-out Panasonic fan and in the market for a 32″ flat-screen TV to replace my old Pana CRT model that is now on its last legs. Having browsed around the usual stores I find selection to be very difficult. I have Sky+ (Non-HD just now) mainly for Sports such as football and rugby, and also like to view home videos.

    I had hoped the above review would have made my choice easy, but its hasn’t.

    I’m disturbed by the questions over ‘black’ density and of poor flesh tones – especially as these are two of the main factors rendering my old TV ready for the scrapyard – brightness and contrast at maximum, red predominates and picture now too dark. I am also concerned over the question of sound quality, as this has been the only longstanding complaint re my old TV – the spoken word especially lacking in clarity (Anne Robinson in Weakest Link being a prime example).

    Also the comment that this TV maybe suitable for the kitchen, has me concerned. I’m looking to use it in the living room, at viewing distances of 10 – 20 feet. And 32″ is the largest I can really accommodate – would I be wasting money looking at this high-spec TV for this application?

    Should I forget the Panasonics and look more seriously at Sony and Samsung?

    All comments gratefully appreciated.

  29. As your review says this TV has an integrated Freesat tuner which is fine for those that have satellite.

    I don’t have satellite and I am looking for another Pansonic LCD TV (I have always bought Panasonic going back over 20 years).

    So I presume Panasonic has designed this TV to also work with an analogue TV signal?

    If so, does it also have Freeview built in for those without satellite?

  30. JOSEPH…At last, someone who has the same problem as me. Ive found that turning off the stereo sound works wonders. The so called background music drowns out any voices and you dont know whats going on. Try it!

    Im on this site at the moment as I think Ive made a terrible mistake….
    I am having Freesat plus installed next week and went to purchase
    a 32″ or 37″ tv.
    I thought the 32″ panasonic with 100 hz sounded impresive for the cost………..
    (what do I know) but was seduced into a 37″ panasonic. The tv is only 50hz.
    Is this good enough for freesat plus?..(Or indeed me)…..Also, peoples faces in close up wobble.
    Is this because Im on an analogue signal at the moment?
    Have I made a stupid mistake, and can I do something about it? Not too technical please.

  31. Chris…I also get the thing with people’s faces wobbling but that’s through a Virgin cable box (not HD). Mine’s the 32″ 100Hz one though. It doesn’t happen all the time, sometimes the picture’s great. When the wobbling thing happens though it’s really distracting and I don’t know what to do about it either(!!!!!).

  32. I have the TX-L32V10B and would advise anyone thinking of buying one – DON’T! The sound is terrible, buzzing, muted, awful. I’ve had the engineer out to maximise it but it’s still totally unacceptable. The salesman has now said ‘That’s the drawback to slimline tv’s – the speakers are so small they’re rubbish.’
    I’m going to buy additional speakers to clarify the sound but I didn’t think I’d have to spend even more, and put even more clutter around the telly.
    Panasonic? Tripe.

  33. Hello everyone,

    I was wondering wether the Panasonic TX-L32C10, which I’m interested in, got the same awesome input lag of S10 or G10. Does anyone know for sure or can point me to a site with a review?! (I dind’t find any with google)

    Thanks in advance,

    Stefano

  34. Need something like this set to mount on wall centrally on swivel in fairly long kitchen. have a sky (not plus) multiroom and thought this would give cheap way into some HD. Issues:

    Presume I will get freesat via sky dish and pick up freesat HD content and also get normal Sky multiroom channels.
    Am I being too tight! Would I be better avoiding freesat TV (in which case which other Panny) and subscribe Sky+?
    Also noticed I can go sky freesat for a one off £20.00. But I dont think this gives any HD content, unless I need correcting.
    Concerned about the iffy sound comments on this set, but sounds ideal otherwise, excepting above possibilities. Will be watching general stuff and sport when son and I exiled from living room TV!

  35. On the verge of purchasing a Panasonic TX-L32G10B
    Having read many reviews most of which are favourable BUT I am now having doubts due to the sound quality. My old ” steam driven” tv the sound is like somebody speakig out of a paper bag . ( No I don’t need a hearing aid )
    Much as I wan’t a new LCD until I find out more about the sound quality I shall keep hold of my cash……..Any comments on this subject would be more than welcome.

  36. Just got my TX-L32 V10…. HD 100htz Freesat and Free View….Picture is absolutely awesome…probably comparable with Sony 100hz CRT I used to have… and am just about to go out and get some blue ray disks to play on the included blue ray player…which under demo in the showroom showed stunning clarity….

    BUT

    in the 3 days I’ve had it there is definately a sound problem on the set, buzzy, distorted, I’ve tried playing with the music/speech variables but to no avail…I hope I have not made a terrible mistake…but notice from a few other posts others are experiencing the same problem….Is external speakers the answer…any help appreciated.

  37. Looks as if Mr Panasonic will be loosing sales due to the fact that too many state sound problems.

  38. Sond is adisgrace on the V10 32 inch, I sent it back the sound on a 37 inch panasonic plasma 2 years old, is stunning. These slim line tvs have rubbish sound the sound distorts when volume is turned up I cannot believe an expensive tv has sound like this, Blue ray has fantastic sound but the tv cannot cope

  39. Reading early comments about the review made me frown and as I ran out of Botox this week and do not wish to have a marred forehead, I opted to vent.

    No one is born with a dictionary in place – if you don’t know what something means, look it up via a search engine, like google.

    Honestly, common sense is a simple application of the brain, perhaps applying it as often as using a credit card might make it a fashionable trait.

  40. having just bought a panasonic tx32 , mainly based on their reputation of reliability and ease of use, i have to say i am so disapointed by the sound quality .
    the tv is almost unwatchable due to buzzing and distortion from the speakers,
    no matter how much i try to drop the base and increase the treble , i doesnt go away , female voices seem ok, but any male voice quickly becomes annoying to the point of switch off.
    i wouldnt recommend this tv to anyone , i paid nearly £500 and feel like ive been robbed.

  41. Just this second set up the 32″ version of this TV, and I’m pretty disappointed. The sound isn’t great, but what’s bugging me most is the SD picture. It’s probably a consequence of being used to CRTs (and maybe being a little closer to the TV than I should), but it’s far too pixellated for my liking, especially when viewing Sky.

    But as I say, I’m pretty certain it’s an LCD thing, and – from what I’ve seen – I doubt anything else is much better.

  42. Thats not accurate the backlight can be adjusted via the service menu.

    To enter the service menu, hold down -VE and press 0 three times on the handset, you’ll get a couple of grey panels containing some info about your TV.

    You can ignore this at this stage, press 1 on the handset and then 3 four times this will show your current backlight level, make a note of this if you want to put back to the original level. To adjust the level use the volume key. I checked mine and have actually set it to 210.

    The values are in hex format so as you adjust the level you’ll see letters as well as numbers. Once you reach the level you’re happy with press OK to save.

  43. >> Player on 6 December 2009 9:18 pm
    Thats not accurate the backlight can be adjusted via the service menu. <<

    But is this adjustment memorised separately for each input source?
    I would like to be able to set a low backlight setting for VGA input (pc desktop usage), and a nornal backlight level for HDMI inputs (movies).

  44. have to have TV on analog to recieve teletext on BBC2 BBC1 ALSO HAVE TO PRESS RED BUTTON ON FREE SAT PRIOR TO PRESSING TELETEXT TO RECIVE TELETEXT UNABLE TO RECIEVE TELETEXT ON DIGITAL WHICH IS AN INCONVINENCE

  45. I’d like to know if this TV supports 4:4:4 colour reproduction when connected to a pc.
    (and it would be nice to check this with every tv, as you already do with some)
    Also, is the 0-15ms delay compared to a CRT ’cause that would make it the fastest LCD ever…
    Has anyone experience on how this display performs as a pc monitor?
    Does the non defeatable sharpening affect text?

calibration

Professional TV Calibration Service

Own this (or any other) TV? Want to get the best picture quality? Book us in to calibrate your set. Affordable price... get a quote now.

Close