Samsung PS51D550 Plasma 3D TV Review

Samsung’s Plasma TVs just seem to be going from strength to strength. In view of this, we were eager to check out the Korean manufacturer’s entry-level 1080p Plasma TV for 2011, the PS51D550. A gander at the spec sheets reveals that when compared to the company’s more expensive Plasma Display Panels (PDPs), the D550 is missing the “Smart TV” internet-connected features, the ultra-slim design, and the satellite connectivity. You still get 4 HDMI inputs, the aforementioned 1080p panel, and surprisingly at this price point, 3D capability. Let’s see if we have a big-screen bargain on our hands here…

Note: The specific model we tested was the Samsung PS51D550C1KXXU which denotes the 3-pin-plug United Kingdom version.

Important Notice: Our Samsung PS51D550 review sample (supplied by Simply Electricals) was delivered to us with a bug whereby the [Digital Noise Filter] setting would operate on its highest setting, even when the menu reported it as being “Off”. This often caused a substantial loss of detail with Blu-ray Discs scanned from film, and other high quality HD sources. We reported this problem to Samsung when we noticed it on the company’s other models, but it is particularly damaging on the PS51D550 due to the fact that as a less expensive model, its noise reduction processing (when enabled) is of lower quality. Fortunately, Samsung has since fixed this issue with a firmware update. This review discusses the Samsung PS51D550 running firmware version 1024 which is, the most recent at the time of writing. The corrected firmware is available as a download from Samsung’s web site or via the TV’s own setup menus if it is connected to a home network.

Please ensure you are running the latest firmware (version 1024 or higher) by checking in the Menu > Support > Contact Samsung > Software Version screen, as the improvement in picture quality is dramatic.

Jump To: OperationCalibrationPicture PerformanceConclusion

Design

The PS51D550 is more simply styled than more expensive models, although like everything Samsung has put out in recent years, the aesthetics of this HDTV are nothing to sniff at. The 51-inch panel is framed by a glossy black bezel which has a rounded border, made of glass-like acrylic. It’s tastefully done and really shouldn’t offend anyone’s design sensibilities.

Samsung PS51D550

It’s not as slim as some of Samsung’s higher-up Plasma models, which is what we expected as this price point, so people looking for an HDTV to mount close to their wall might want to go slightly higher-up to the D6900 series (which we’ll be reviewing shortly).

Connections

The Samsung PS51D550 features 4 HDMI inputs, an aerial input to feed the Freeview HD tuner, a shared Composite/Component input (how’s that for two polar opposites of video quality?), a single SCART terminal, and an analogue RGB input for use with computers. There’s also a LAN socket for connecting the TV to a router, although as a cheaper model, the 51D550 doesn’t really have much in the way of internet features. There is no built-in wireless capability on this display, although a Samsung wireless dongle can still be attached to a USB input at additional cost.

Rear connections
Rear: 4 x HDMI, VGA, Component, SCART, aerial, ethernet & audio outs

One thing we noticed was that the PS51D550’s supplied power cable is unusually short. This is going to pose a problem for users wall-mounting the plasma. In fact, even when we reviewed the TV with its table-top stand, we had difficulty in finding a socket to plug it into for this reason.

Operation

The D550 PDP doesn’t feature the newly styled 2011 Samsung menus, but rather the 2010 variant with a font change. That’s fine by us, since they are easy to navigate, and fairly quick to use (although we’d appreciate being able to turn off the transition animations to make things even quicker).

[Picture] menu [Picture] menu
[Picture] menu

The Samsung PS51D550 features all of the basic video controls you’d expect, but lacks the advanced three-axis Colour Management menus present on some more expensive HDTVs from the TV maker, and also features a traditional 2-point Greyscale calibration control rather than the more precise 10-point variant. Neither of these are necessarily problems, unless the PS51D550’s out-of-the-box picture accuracy is lacking (previous Samsung Plasmas have had this problem and have needed adjustment, so, fingers crossed that isn’t the case here). We’ll find out if this is a big oversight in the next section, when we measure and then adjust the D550 plasma for the best possible picture.

2D Calibration

Note: Our Samsung PS51D550 review sample was calibrated using Calman Professional, the industry-leading video calibration software.

2D Mode Greyscale

After we let the 51D550 “break in” for a few hours (with Plasma TVs, the overall tint to the image can change most when new), we changed the picture mode to “Movie” and the [Colour Temperature] to “Warm2”, since these settings usually give the most accurate starting point. We displayed some Greyscale test patterns and used our calibration meter to see how pure they were:

Pre-calibration RGB Tracking
Pre-calibration RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs)

This is a good pre-calibrated result, with the overall Greyscale shades being produced by the Samsung PS51D550 review unit being slightly green-deficient overall. We noticed also that the HDTV ships with its [Contrast] control set too high, which results in pure white tones appearing blue-tinted. We reduced this as part of the calibration process to achieve better neutrality.

Post-calibration RGB Tracking in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration RGB tracking and dEs in [Movie] mode

After calibration, we were left with high quality Greyscale tracking. It was difficult to keep the brighter parts of the image free of tints, but fortunately, errors in brighter areas are generally easier to ignore, anyway. A slight excess of red in the dark 10% region was the only (fairly minor) complaint we had left. Higher-end models will be able to avoid this slight inaccuracy with their 10-point White Balance calibration tool.

Gamma curve in [Movie] mode Gamma tracking in [Movie] mode
Gamma curve in [Movie] mode Corresponding gamma tracking

We were surprised by how accurate the Samsung PS51D550’s Gamma tracking measured, since this is an area where (affordable) Plasmas typically lag behind LCDs. Panasonic’s comparable ST30 entry-level 3D Plasma television presented less accurate brightness distribution compared to this Samsung, during the same measurements. Linear gamma tracking means that the TV will be able to show a smooth, steady gradation from the darkest to the brightest tones in the image, resulting in a subtly more realistic picture. It’s also worth pointing out that the TV’s [Gamma] control can be adjusted in several steps to give a richer or brighter picture; we left it at its default “0” setting to achieve the above result (2.2).

2D Mode Colour

The Samsung PS51D550 features just two [Colour Space] options: “Auto” and “Native”. “Auto” is the best of the two, with the latter option over-saturating Green (and by extension, Cyan) a little more. The “Auto” mode isn’t perfect, but given the value for money on offer here, we don’t think these small hue and saturation errors will trouble too many people.

We did make minor adjustments to the [Colour] and [Hue] controls to achieve the following results:

Post-calibration CIE chart in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration CIE chart with reference to HD Rec.709
Post-calibration Luminance levels in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration colour luminance (coloured bars = targets; black bars = measured values)

3D Calibration

As an entry level model, the PS51D550 doesn’t come supplied with any 3D active-shutter eyewear, but we used a pair of the Samsung SSG-3100 glasses we had to hand to assess this 3DTV’s extra-dimensional capabilities (and also to calibrate it using our Klein K-10 meter).

Like all 2011 Samsung TVs, we were glad to see that the D550 plasma features discrete picture settings for both the 2D and 3D modes. This means that when you start watching 3D content, the TV switches to a different picture mode (which we can optimise for 3D) automatically, and then switches back when you return to 2D. This is good user interface design.

We pulled out our disc of 3D test patterns, and with the 3D glasses turned on and attached to our meter, we measured Greyscale neutrality:

3D Mode Greyscale

3D Pre-calibration RGB Tracking
3D Pre-calibration RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs)

Greyscale tracking looked promising in the early stages of measurement, but as we progressed through the different brightness levels, we soon saw the PS51D550 adding far too much blue to brighter shades. Perhaps this is a deliberate ploy on Samsung’s part to make the image seem superficially brighter? The glasses themselves add a cold blue tint to the image, so we knew that we would have to increase the amount of red to compensate during calibration.

3D Post-calibration RGB Tracking in [Movie] mode
3D Post-calibration RGB tracking and dEs in [Movie] mode

We managed to make a tremendous improvement to the 3-dimensional image neutrality by compensating for the 3D glasses’ own colour tint. We were stuck with a mysterious excess of red in the 30% and 40% stimulus levels, but we were happy to tolerate this remaining limitation given how overly blue the image was before we calibrated the 3D TV.

3D Mode Colour

Colour was acceptable in the third dimension, although the green primary was oversaturated compared to the Rec.709 HDTV standard. This isn’t an area that greatly concerns us at present, since there is so little 3D content – and so much of it is animated. That’s not to say that animated films don’t deserve accurate representation (we’re sure the artists who work hard on them wouldn’t be happy if we took that attitude!), but simply to say that we don’t expect the same level of realism from them.

3D Post-calibration CIE chart in [Movie] mode
3D Post-calibration CIE chart with reference to HD Rec.709
3D Post-calibration Luminance levels in [Movie] mode
3D Post-calibration colour luminance (coloured bars = targets; black bars = measured values)

Benchmark Test Results

Dead pixels One purple in top-right; one sometimes black in top-centre
Screen uniformity Perfect
Overscanning on HDMI 0% with aspect ratio set to “Screen Fit”
Blacker than black Passed
Calibrated black level in cd/m2 (black screen) 0.06 (24p Cinema Smooth); 0.04 (60hz); 0.066 (50hz)
Calibrated black level in cd/m2 (ANSI) 0.07 (24p Cinema Smooth); 0.057 (60hz); 0.074 (50hz)
Black level retention No instability noted
Primary chromaticity Very Good
Scaling Poor (576i), Average (576p)
Video mode deinterlacing Very effective jaggies reduction
Film mode deinterlacing Passed 2-2 PAL and 3-2 NTSC tests
Viewing angle Perfect (Plasma)
Motion resolution 900
Digital noise reduction Present, optional, see note at beginning of review
Sharpness Defeatable edge enhancement
Luma/Chroma bandwidth (2D Blu-ray) Full Luma, Chroma horizontally blurred
Image retention Yes, but fades quickly
Posterization Very small “hardened” edges during fast motion
Phosphor trails Very mild
1080p/24 capability No judder in 2D or 3D
Input lag 16ms on HDMI1 input set to “PC”, 31ms otherwise
Full 4:4:4 reproduction (PC) Yes, on HDMI1 input set to “PC” or “DVI PC” only

Power Consumption

Default [Standard] mode (2D) 212 watts
Default [Standard] mode (3D) 284 watts
Calibrated [Movie] mode (2D) 212 watts
Calibrated [Movie] mode (3D) 288 watts
Standby 1 watt

Measurements taken with full 50% grey screen.

Picture Performance

Black Level

When we viewed the Samsung PS51D550 in a darkened room, we could tell that the darkness of its blacks wasn’t up to the market-leading standards of the Panasonic Plasma TVs, although we weren’t really troubled by the image on offer. In other words, the black level quality was adequate, although not class-leading. Imagine our delight when we used our Klein K-10 meter to get the hard data on the PS51D550’s black level quality, and found that it performed almost identically to Samsung’s top-end Plasma TV for 2011, the D8000. The PS51D8000 did manage to retain black levels during the mixed white/black ANSI checkerboard test, however, although the differences are negligible in real world usage.

As usual for Samsung Plasmas, the depth of the blacks depends on the type of content you are watching, with the darkest blacks coming from US (and Korea)-centric 60hz signals, and the worst coming from European-standard 50hz (24p Blu-ray content sits right in the middle). The reason for this is to avoid flicker. 60hz is high enough to be output by the screen at 60hz, whereas 50hz output would produce too much flicker, so is output at 100hz, with each frame from the source being flashed up on the screen twice before the panel begins drawing the next frame. Likewise, 24hz film content would be intolerable if it were output at 24hz, so the PS51D550 outputs these signals at a higher rate. With Samsung’s Plasma design, the higher the refresh rate, the lighter the blacks.

As a film lover, I’m personally most concerned about the black level in the 24p mode, since this is the frame rate delivered by a Blu-ray player. The 0.06 cd/m2 blacks with 24p film content didn’t really disappoint. 0.06 cd/m2 is similar to the black levels put out by some current-generation LCD displays (although Samsung’s LCD TVs are managing 0.03-0.04 cd/m2). However, we feel that any lingering greyness in the blacks put out by a Plasma television draw less attention to themselves than on LCDs, due to the fact that the darkness is more consistent across the entire screen. With LCD, the blacks almost always appear brighter at some screen locations, especially near the edges, and they change depending on the viewer’s sitting location.

With 60hz material (such as modern console games, and any non-24p film content coming from the US), blacks were a respectable 0.04 cd/m2, just slightly (but not noticeably) higher than those put out by Panasonic’s comparably priced and specced ST30 plasma range. For European 50hz content, blacks measured at 0.066 cd/m2. To the human eye, this won’t really look any different to the 0.060 cd/m2 put out by the 24p mode.

All in all, we were happy with this level of performance (it’s also a big step up on last year’s Samsung Plasmas). Who knows – maybe next year they’ll be at Panasonic levels?

Motion Resolution

We clocked the PS51D550’s motion resolution somewhere in the region of 900 lines, making it high enough to not be an issue. We did occasionally spot some slight red phosphor trailing in test sequences and on the edges of the details in the chart.

Unlike competing Plasma televisions from Panasonic, we almost never noticed posterisation (contouring) during movement, as is typical for Samsung’s Plasmas. High-motion video content did reveal some “hardened” edges if we looked closely, but these artefacts were minor and did not display with unwanted colour tints.

3D Material

The Samsung PS51D550 passed all our 3D tests with flying colours. Unlike the company’s comparable LCD TV models, the D550 displays all three frame rates (24, 50 and 60) without any judder or stutter in 3D. It also reproduces all 1080 lines of the 3D image, which is something that Panasonic Plasmas don’t do this year – not even the top-end VT30 model. The 3D experience presented by Samsung’s Plasma panels appears to be remarkably consistent from the entry-level models up to the high-end.

During subjective viewing, we were happy to see almost no crosstalk present. If we ramped up the 3D depth settings to exaggerate the 3D effect, it became visible, but this is to be expected. Our only real criticisms of the PS51D550 operating in 3D mode were the darkening of the picture, and the rougher gradation (with a higher amount of dither noise in the picture) when compared to 2D. The same goes for other manufacturer’s Plasma-based 3D TVs, too. Although things are much improved on the first generation 3D Plasmas, the fact still remains that 2D images have the edge for overall quality, and ultimately, looks.

Standard Definition

Standard-def handling was a mixed bag on the Samsung PS51D550. The quality of the scaling (that’s the actual resizing step) with our European-standard PAL (576i) test chart was the worst we’ve seen from an HDTV in years, with horizontal details appearing hugely blurred, with ringing around edges. Vertical detail fared a little better. The test chart represents an idealised scenario, however, and a lot of SD content in the real world is so soft that the TV’s limitation might not really be noticeable.

When we output the same test chart in Progressive mode (576p), it was more tolerable, but still below our expectations. This will be of consequence to owners of standard-def games consoles such as the Nintendo Wii (or anything from the previous generation). We imagine it’s less of an issue for DVD, since most of us have an upscaling DVD (or Blu-ray) player now (remember that the TV’s standard def handling capabilities only matter when standard-def is input to it – when played through a Blu-ray player, DVDs are “seen” by the TV as High Definition). Interestingly, this poor scaling did not really show itself with standard def channels accessed via the PS51D550’s own digital TV tuner… perhaps the fact that most SD TV channels are blurry to begin with simply disguised the limitation.

Interestingly, the D550 plasma had no trouble at all locking onto the PAL 2-2 film cadence, which is something that higher-end Samsung HDTVs have been tripped up by lately. This meant that films transferred to the European standard-def TV system played back without any annoying flickering/loss of resolution in detailed areas. Its handling of diagonal interpolation – in other words, concealing jaggedness in interlaced standard-def images – was also good, meaning that jagged lines on diagonal edges (the markings on a football pitch, for example) will be kept to a minimum.

In other words, the PS51D550’s SD performance was overall acceptable, if a little bit blurred.

High Definition

When we first received the PS51D550, we were upset at the quality presented during Blu-ray viewing. Although some edges in the image still appeared sharp, fine details were being smudged out, and the overall clarity of the picture was reduced. We soon found out that this was due to the [Digital Noise Filter], which was chomping through film grain and other high frequency textures in the picture and giving the whole film a slight “watercolour painting” look.

We found out that the culprit was a bug which we reported to Samsung with their LCD televisions some months ago; where the [Digital Noise Filter] setting would actually be stuck at its highest level, despite the TV’s menus reporting it as being Off. We could actually get all the picture detail back by turning the filter on to “Low” and then to “Off” again – but we had to do this every single time we selected the input that our player was connected to.

Firefly

Fortunately, the bug has been solved with the latest firmware update. We upgraded to this by downloading the file from Samsung’s web site and feeding it to the TV on a USB drive, and were delighted to see that after a few minutes, our freshly updated PS51D550 was playing back high-quality film material from Blu-ray without skipping a beat (or a pixel, for that matter). Unlike higher-up Samsung displays, “Off” with the D550 plasma actually does mean “Off”, probably because the TV we reviewed used the MStar processor and doesn’t have access to the more advanced noise reduction which Samsung are so eager to enable on TVs which use their own chip. With the 51D550 as we reviewed it, there is no unwanted noise reduction, allowing all of the clarity, texture and detail from high quality film scans to come through on the Samsung PS51D550. Excellent!

With that out of the way, we were only left with the many other positives of the Samsung PS51D550’s images. The black levels aren’t class-leading (that award currently goes to Panasonic), but the HDTV produces a brighter image with enough positives of its own. Greyscale tracking and colour reproduction were both of a high standard, presenting films without too much in the way of unwanted tints. Motion was handled perfectly when we set the [Film Mode] setting to “Cinema Smooth” (it can be left “Off” to reproduce films at 60hz, which results in judder, but slightly deeper blacks). Unlike older Samsung Plasmas, 50hz material was also trouble-free.

The Samsung PS51D550’s panel driving method appears a little noisier than that of Panasonic’s Plasmas, but it’s cleaner than Pioneer’s were, and perhaps because of the additional slight noise in the picture, false contouring (an artefact related to Plasma TVs which causes high motion areas to appear as separated stripes rather than a smooth, continuous tone) is kept to a bare minimum.

Automatic brightness limiting, a drawback of Plasma display technology, was visible with some content (we should point out that this isn’t specific to HD). A fully white screen will appear dimmer than on an LCD display. Supposedly, this is to decrease load on the power supply. The effects of it are not really visible with most content, but adverts (for example) with fully white screens will sometimes reveal some brightness fluctuation.

The last plasma-specific thing to note is image retention. Samsung’s PDPs have improved in this regard in recent years, but they are still behind Panasonic’s. After watching a 4:3 film, or after watching the BBC News channel, for example, we were usually left with some faint residual images (either of side-borders, or the BBC News channel logo) hanging around. These cleared up very quickly, though, and we don’t think it’s too big an issue. First time PDP owners might be terrified that these residual images are permanent damage, but rest assured, every case of image persistence we came across cleared up quickly.

One last thing to mention for completeness: during one point of a film we used to test the PS51D550, we saw a subtle flicker in the image (which lasted for only a few frames) which occurred each time we played the scene – but only in the “Cinema Smooth” output mode. It was very minor and we only noticed it once.

Bottom line: we were very, very happy with the 2D HD image quality with this plasma television.

Console Gaming

We weren’t expecting the PS51D550 to do wonderfully or woefully when it came to gaming, because most of Samsung’s plasmas have managed respectable, but not leading amounts of responsiveness lately. The 51D550 exceeded our expectations with an exceptionally speedy 16ms, but we had to use the “PC” input label (accessed by pressing Source > HDMI1/DVI > Tools > Edit Name > PC) to achieve this speed. We’re also not sure if it will enable with all sources, although it did with our Xbox 360 Elite feeding the panel. (This also results in full uncompressed colour being displayed in the 4:4:4 format, for those of you who are both hardcore gamers and hardcore videophiles). Remember that this trick only works on the HDMI1 input, so gamers should give their favourite system priority when connecting.

Without this trick, the Samsung PS51D550 still managed a respectable, but slightly game-altering 31ms of input lag.

Conclusion

It’s a winner. After upgrading the firmware to eradicate the rogue noise reduction system, we were absolutely delighted with the detail, clarity, texture, and overall image put out by this affordable big-screen Plasma TV. It can also deliver a remarkably speedy gaming experience. While it’s not without flaws, we think that given these strengths and a bargain price tag, the Samsung PS51D550 deserves a “Highly Recommended” rating.

The PS51D550’s most direct competitor is the Panasonic TX-P50ST30, which now costs around £160 more and does have some advantages over this cheaper Samsung, including a superior (and consistent) black level: Panasonic’s 3D plasma goes as dark as 0.03 cd/m2 in all modes, compared to the D550’s 0.04, 0.06, or 0.07 (depending on the video format). The ST30 also has a superior light rejecting screen coating, allowing it to produce a richer picture even when ambient light is present in the room, and slightly better colour accuracy, resulting in picture reproduction which is that bit closer to what was intended by the filmmakers and colourists. However, not one of these categories is actually bad on the PS51D550 – it’s just that they’re slightly better on the Panasonic. (Keep in mind that when we reviewed the rival ST30, we gave it a “Recommended” – rather than “Highly Recommended” – rating due to its high price at launch, which has now fallen.)

However, the Samsung PS51D550 has several advantages of its own, on top of its less expensive price. For a start, it portrays slightly cleaner motion (with less false contouring during high-speed content like televised sports), has more accurate gamma tracking for a subtly more realistic image, can produce a brighter picture, and displays all 1080 lines of the full HD 3D signal with not a drop of detail appearing blurred or jagged. For the minority of users who will be calibrating the 3DTV in 3D mode, it also has separate control over 3D Greyscale (White Balance), which Panasonic’s ST30 does not (in fact, that plasma can only be calibrated in 2D in a hidden service menu). There’s also the extra inch of screen size, if you’re counting.

These strengths, coupled with the lower price, mean that the Samsung PS51D550 is a tempting alternative and a worthy competitor in a marketplace which is dominated by Panasonic. Comparisons aside, it’s also a very nice HDTV in its own right, especially at the price we reviewed it at. Samsung, please keep improving your Plasma products like this – we can’t wait to see what you do with this display technology next year!

Highly Recommended

45 comments

  1. Hi, very interesting review (sorry for my english).
    I’m challenging this hdtv against panny G30 (and not ST30 as you did).
    According to your point of view, which one is best for sports (football, tennis and so on) and/or SD signals?
    Thanks in advance.

  2. I have this TV – love it…

    Just wondering if you can list all the settings that you got after calibration? I’ve calibrated mine too, but interested to see how they match…

    Thanks

  3. I have the TV too – really happy with it. Would love to see some settings. Thanks.

  4. @Albius
    The G30 is more of an equal comparison, because it doesn’t have the Infinite Black Pro filter. For fast motion, Samsung wins. For SD sharpness, Panasonic has a slight edge. Between the two, I would probably go for the Samsung – although the Panasonic’s screen coating is perhaps a little bit better.

    Settings will come soon.

  5. Hi,

    You mention that you have witnessed very few brightness pops. Some people see them a lot and bothers them.

    Since Samsung have fixed the Digital Noise Reduction bug after you complained to them, maybe you can write to Samsung about the Brightness Pops. Samsung seems to ignore everybody else about it. Panasonic also had these pops but they fixed it.

    There’s already a facebook page about the brightness pops to try and persuade Samsung to fix them.

    Thank you for the great review,

    Sypack.

  6. Hi, David
    Great review as allways on this site. (best tv review site on the Internet)
    Which TV could be the better choice for gaming (PS3), blu-ray (PS3), 3D (film + mainly PS3 gaming) and normal digital tv broadcast (mainly SD) ?

    The LG 42LW650S or the Samsung PS51D550 ?
    The two device is on the same price level if I buy a 3D glasses separetly for the samsung.

    I can’t decide because I have a fear for plasma burn-ins and uneven aging pixels but also I fear that the black levels on the LG will be worse than my actual TV (Samsung 40R81).
    I also like more the passive approach over the active. But also the passive 3D has limited vertical viewing angles. The plasma has a reflective surface which also a negative point.
    What would be your choice if I may ask ?

  7. Hi, very good review !
    Will you test soon the Samsung Lcd 3D first-range series ? Namely the d6100 series?
    I own one of these screens and I think that this series presents a green push.!!

  8. Great review , keep the good work

  9. Thank you, David !

  10. hi david,

    when you review the d6900 could you please look out for brightness pops on bright scenes or with material that has a lot of white with movement. please look for it on the in built freeview and on gaming.

    for gaming could you test for brightness pops on a game like cod black ops and go on one of the snow maps and pan the camera round pointing towards the sky.

    also could you put in the review what the build date is and what firmware the tv is for the d6900.

    if you can do this it would be much appreciated cheers.

  11. Great review David as usual
    i have a panasonic G10 plasma . Do you think the d550 is gonna have a better HD picture overall ? iam only intrested in 2d . thanks in advance

  12. great review, settings please :)
    David, I have a question about samsung hdmi black level option: normal is pc levels (0-255) and low is video levels (16-235)? I asking becasue I have a problem with proper combination with xbox360 and ps3, are settings below correct?
    limited+low/ full+normal (ps3)
    standard+low/expanded+normal (x360)

    thanks

  13. Nice review as always. :)

    I would add some notes and ask something.

    The PC mode is very nice, indeed. But it requires some tweaking in the service menu to get rid of the slight clipping (it clips either near-black or near-white shades by default) if you want to calibrate the Standard picture mode for a dark room. You need to readjust the “ADC Results” manually (increase the higher three values with “trial and error” method until you get it done). And even after this, the gray-scale won’t be too nice. This was the best I could do in PC mode:
    http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/4171/d550pccalibrated.png

    And later I decided that I prefer the accuracy over the input lag. ~16ms is fast (I noticed that it’s faster than my old LCD) but ~31ms isn’t unbearable either.
    This is the best I could do in Movie mode for 60Hz input after even more tweaking in the SM:
    http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/8206/d550movie60hzcalibrated.png

    I noticed it later that the CMS isn’t linear, the chromaticity fluctuates a bit across the color shades. It is visible on the single color gradients. But it doesn’t seem to be a real problem with movies, it’s still better than Auto gamut and that one isn’t unusable either, so…

    Did you notice this non-linearity with the upper models which has the Custom gamut option by default?
    Again, it’s not too easy to tell unless you search for it on color gradient test patterns. But it’s easily measurable if you calibrate the gamut with 100% stimulus patches and you re-measure the results with 75% stimulus patches. (I found it the best to calibrate with Small APL patterns for grayscale and gamut and use 100% stimulus for the gamut instead of 75%.)

  14. Thanks for the review David I bought this set and I am very happy with it.

    I am probably not looking correctly but can we have your full settings for 3d and 2d blu-ray and for HDTV Sky etc.

    You used to put these up previously and have found them very helpful over the years.

  15. 2D and 3D settings PLS!!!

  16. Calibrated settings have been published on our Facebook page here:

    http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.251389401572109.69168.110909255620125

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  17. Are you sure about Sharpness=0 ?

    I played a lot with this value until I left it at 6 but it seems like it blurs the dark images a bit (but >10 seems to sharpen everything else), 0 looks way too blurry for me (mostly visible on dark shades, the shadows around the black fonts are very exaggerated, like there were a bold font style).

  18. Thanks for the settings :)
    Keep up the good work!!

  19. I suppose D6900 got highly recommended not recommended or QR because this tv is outstanding and better from D550

  20. The latest update seems to have given all the grain back to my ps64d8000.
    My mate has the ue55d8000 and the same has happened with his. Yay for Samsung.
    You boys can borrow my 64 for review if you like. Or come to me and do it ;-)

  21. well i first bougth this tv the pn51d550 but it have a lot of problems with the floating blacks the blacks was good but, when i change the tv for the tc-p50st30 wooow amazing blacks the same sharp image, and a very good color reproduction, and the better of all here in mexico the samsung cost me arround 1800 dollars and the panasonic cost 1350 dollars that a huge price range, after two panasonic plasmas i recoment the st30 and if you have the chanse to take the gt30 take im.

  22. concerning the image retention you say it has but fades quickly on this tv, would you say that the d550 would be ok for gaming and not be an issue.

  23. Hi

    Thanks for the great review David.

    When can we see Samsung PS51D6900 Plasma Tv Review please ?

    Many Thanks

  24. Not a word on the reflections. They seems to be really bad on this screen. Read several fora about this telly. A warning for everyone thinking of buying this television.

  25. @ pioneer 1985

    Definitely! I use it as a PC monitor. I am currently writing this text on it…
    I watch some 16:9 materials too but I mostly play PC games or watch 2.35:1 movies on it.

    Be careful in the first 1000 (not only 200!) hours and you will be fine. (Be careful = do not limit your brightness but vary your content – limited brightness settings will only extend the relatively long break-in period…)

    The PC mode is fast, relatively OK after a calibration (see my earlier CalMan screenshot) and nice (the 4:4:4 reproduction is useful with games, the 4:2:2 chroma subsampling can distort the anti-alising…). It’s almost perfect for gaming and at least as good if not definitely better as any Panasonic on the market (excluding the contrast ratio).

    I did 200 hours of “hard break-in” with maxed settings (Cell Light 20, Contrast 95, etc) with the built-in scrolling bars. And it still wasn’t enough. I experienced some persistent IR from game HUDs until it passed ~1000 hours. But after that, I can’t imagine how could any reasonable usage cause persistent IR on this panel which is visible not only on black test patches but (for example) film materials…

    I feel I have a CRT monitor again. I started to use PCs with CRT monitors and I never worried about IR/BI. Later I thought I had to use LCDs but then I found this TV. I worried about IR/BI at the beginning and I did have some IR issues when the panel was young, but now it feels good to have a plasma on my desk.

  26. @Tóth F. János
    Mabye you are used to an Edgeenhanced picture?

  27. @Tóth F. János
    Hi
    Do you have a different settings for this plasma than hdtvtest.co.uk ?
    Could you post it somewhere ? (2D, 3D, 60Hz, 24Hz)
    Have you used the 10 point calibration ? (there is a trick to activate it in the service menu: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1339743 )

    The high contrast / bright scenes high frequency buzzing is permanent in this TV ? (this is not a big issue I’m just curious. I can hear it allways when changing Tv channel and a bright bar is visible during the switch on the black screen.)

  28. @ Turrican4D

    No.
    The PC mode of this TV was always free from any noise filtering or sharpening.
    I knew about the stuck noise filter. I reseted it after every input switches and reboots.
    I have a notebook with LED-LCD.
    I know how fonts should look like on displays.

    @ Lacix

    Yes, yes, maybe.

    I calibrated my TV with the advanced calibration controls.

    I have 3 sets of settings:
    24Hz with CS (96Hz) + 50Hz (100Hz) – they are very similar and I rarely watch 50Hz materials.
    60Hz with Movie mode
    60Hz with Standard PC mode

    I can post them somewhere but I also made changes in the Service Menu (under ADC/WB) and you have to apply those settings as well or forget about all of them.

    They say the panel-to-panel differences are relatively big with Samsung 2011 PDPs.

    Do you still want to try them? I think I will find a suitable thread on some European A/V forum to write a long post and copy the link here.

  29. @ Tóth F. János

    yes could you please post your settings on av forums in the d550 owners thread.
    if i get the tv, i and others would like to try your settings.

  30. Done: http://www.avforums.com/forums/15513684-post650.html
    (Don’t compare these with David’s settings. He calibrated for different gamma target and I used the Service Menu too…)

  31. @ Tóth F. János
    Thanks for the settings but I think I will not use them because I don’t want to mix up the inputs of the TV with this D7000 cheat.
    Do you watch 3D content on this TV ?
    I see more crosstalk when watching scenes with light things on dark/black background. Is it something which improves after the break in period ? Do you have some experience with it ?

  32. when d6900 review?

  33. So have Samsung released firmware updates that allow the user to disable the forced noise reduction on all their affected TVs or is it only on this particular model?

  34. Yes, I watched almost every 3D Blu-Ray movies which looked like either interesting or “not too boring/annoying” from the trailers.

    No, it won’t improve, it’s just the glasses. LCDs doesn’t have either infinite contrast ratio or zero response time, so don’t expect the LCD shutters to close and open perfectly in fast cycles. It causes visible crosstalk on high contrast overlaying image elements and also cuts back the peak brightness.

    Panasonic glasses aren’t perfect either. Read the VT30 review here.
    They are better in crosstalk, but don’t forget those displays have resolution problems. First time I saw a VT30 in 3D, I thought I should turn off the overscan and/or pixel orbiter, increase the sharpness, or something but… no, it was just the resolution loss… And it also caused some artifacts which looked like some kind of crosstalk. I didn’t understand how could that be crosstalk (it wasn’t a high contrast difference), but it was the resolution loss yet again.

  35. Now samsung have free’d the grain on their tvs where would you put the d80000 in your listings. I have the 64 and the only place in my opinion now that it loses is in the black level. Just not quite as inky

  36. Marcus, don’t forget the more finegraded pwm-noise of the Panasonics in the grey shades near black.

    Also 0.011 cd/m2 (65″ VT30) vs 0.05 cd/m2 (64″ D8000) is quiet a difference and that is out of the box. Panas MLL gets lower as the hours of use rises.

  37. Well aware of the black level difference. I have a 50 inch vt20 and now a 50 inch vt30 for my games room. For a grand more on the largest models (more at some places) I am happy to lose some black level etc. Samsung are getting closer and panny certainly need to sort a few things to stay on top. Although I do prefer the build quality of Panasonic and their general look.

  38. Ive got the 51D6900 and i got it for MAINLY 3D gaming on my PS3 and altough i love the fact the crosstalk is sooo much better than last years Samsung 3D LCD tv i had that had to go back, i am now more or less CRIPPLED by the motion judder when im gaming in 2D. Is there anybody on here that can tell me of ANYWAY i can try and reduce this motion judder?

  39. I have almost 300 hours on my set now and the image retention is just as bad as it was at the beginning.

    Here is when i notice ir:

    – 1 minute text-tv
    – if i pause movie for few minutes
    – 2.39:1 movie for few minutes(less than 5 minutes)
    – subtitles leave faint ir
    – when i start up tv then the samsung logo leaves marks for few seconds

    So does that sound normal? I think that sounds like an old LG plasma that my friend had. Not as bad but almost as bad. The good thing is that it fades away quickly after i use scrolling bars, but it is annoying.

    Other problem im having with this is set is horizontal banding. I can see it easily when there is vertical camera pans and the backround is white, blue or gray. For example if i play nhl 12 with xbox or on a movie scene that shows sky. One reason why i switched from lcd to plasma was that i hate banding. So im kinda dissapointed.

    Also my set buzz’s when there is lots of white etc. I can hear it very clearly, but that doesnt bother me much.

    So is my set ****** and should i try to get replacement? Or is that kind ir and banding normal for these sets?

  40. Does anybody has information about inout lag for 59″ version of this display? I am really excited that 51″ has only 16ms lag but can’t find anywhere information about larger version;/

  41. After 4 months my first unit died – think a capacitator: from an occasional power cut to simply not able to stay powered on. Unit was replaced swiftly, in Samsung’s credit. Now I get an odd glitch on various movie files (MKV, divx etc) when playing them from a USB external HD via the in-built media player, where thick, vertical bars in a lumo green will flash on / off on-screen at a rapid frequency – completely unwatchable. Stop the file and reply and all is ok (so not the file itself). Happened quite a bit lately and hoping I don’t have another lemon on my hands. I took out an extended 3 year warranty on my unit (so 4 in total). My advice is TO DO THE SAME. Repairs will be costly and the failure rate I do reckon is pretty high.

  42. See another comment or two on reflections, so I’ll chime in: the D550 is comparable to a mirror. Even with all of my super-thick curtains drawn during the day, I can still see reflections. I can live with it, but if you’re a perfectionist either upgrade or buy an LCD (I’d avoid LED due to screen uniformity issues). The D450 in my bedroom is equally reflective and due to more ambient light leaking from various locations (that I’m unable to plug) is almost impossible to watch during the day. I’d still choose the D550 over LCD due to screen size – an extra 5″ makes a huge difference and most about it is decent for the price. Avoid the D450 720p plasma at all costs if you plan to sit 2 metres or closer to the unit: the plasma dither is worse than on the D550 and can be noticeable.

  43. Hi, I’m just wondering if the software update 1024 would be compatible with my PS51D550-C1N unit (asia)? I understand that you used a C1K unit. Because no firmware update is available in the samsung asia website and when searched directly on the tv is says no firmware updates found. I’m just concerned with the digital noise thing, I’m not sure if it’s just me but my 720p images seem too sharp and grainy.

  44. hi, nice review. what do you think about the two different values of the black level measured by you and this review? flatpanelshd the same model with almost double black levels

  45. To HDTVTest.co.uk – thanks for the detail on this site, great work. Shame you can’t get through more screens! Any chance you can look at the LG 50PM680T? It seems too good to be true in features:money, there must be a catch!

    To fellow readers:

    I am interested in this TV and went to a store to check it out today. Reading around, I have reservations about Samsung reliability (clicking and power problems, screen delamination, buzzing) to the point I might avoid altogether. I did have a Panny 47″ plasma but the buzzing was so loud it had to go back. Been cautiously looking for an alternative for ages.

    For those who own a Samsung any of your experience on the following would be good:

    1) Buzzing sound from the TV (not through the speakers)
    2) Peeling or delamination of the mylar screen coating
    3) (Intermittent) power on/off problems, clicking sounds from the TV, possibly resulting in TV taking ages to switch on or eventually not switching on at all
    4) Samsung tech support when in and/or out of warranty
    5) Retailer response if you had any problems with the TV
    6) What do you think of Samsung Smart TV Features?
    7) Reflectivity of the screen – does it tick you off?

    Thanks.

calibration

Professional TV Calibration Service

Own this (or any other) TV? Want to get the best picture quality? Book us in to calibrate your set. Affordable price... get a quote now.

Close