Samsung UE48JU7500 4K TV Review

Samsung’s affection for curved UHD (ultra high-definition) screens shows no sign of abating, and the South Korean manufacturer is lining up more such TVs for the year ahead. After reviewing the excellent JS9500 and JS9000 ranges, today we’re taking a looking at the JU7500 series, Samsung’s highest-end 2015 TV that doesn’t carry the company’s intriguing “SUHD” branding. This means no quantum dot colours or compatibility with future HDR (high dynamic range) content, although the display still features native 3840×2160 resolution, a quad-core processor, and the firm’s new Tizen-based Smart TV platform.

Samsung UE48JU7500

At 48 inches, the UE48JU7500 we’re testing is also the smallest screen from Samsung if you’re hell-bent on getting a curved telly, though larger JU7500 sizes are available in the shape of the 55-inch UE55JU7500 and the 65-inch UE65JU7500. Let’s see how it fares in our review.

Design

While not the thinnest, the bezel on the 48JU7500 sports a tasteful brushed metallic grey finish, and recesses inwards towards the LCD screen to bring greater sense of depth in addition to the curvature.

Samsung JU7500

The panel is supported on a non-swivel pedestal stand whose base is – what else? – curved and carries a forward-facing “UHD” inscription.

Connections

The Samsung JU7500 comes with an external box – dubbed “One Connect Mini” – that provides four HDMI 2.0 ports with HDCP 2.2 compliance, two USB 2.0 inputs and a digital optical audio output. It’s smaller than the full-fat version supplied with the step-up JS9500 and JS9000 models, and is fanless so operation is completely silent.

One Connect Mini

However, this does mean that some connection sockets have to reside on the side of the TV itself, and the One Connect Mini doesn’t offer the same futureproofing potential as the One Connect.

Side connections
Side: Component, USB 3.0, LAN, Freeview HD & satellite tuners, headphone out & CI slot

Calibration

We calibrated our Samsung UE48JU7500T review unit using a profiled Klein K10-A meter, a DVDO AVLab TPG 4K signal generator, and CalMAN Ultimate version 5.4 calibration software. Out of the box, the most accurate picture preset was [Movie] mode, which we used as our platform for further adjustments.

There were no surprises here: the excellent calibration controls provided by Samsung on the UE-48JU7500 allowed us to dial greyscale, gamma and colours in to the D65, 2.4 and Rec.709 targets that have been the standard (for HDTV) used within the video and broadcast industry. If anything, colour saturation (red primary in particular) tracked even better than the quantum-dot-equipped SUHD sets, since the JU7500’s native colour gamut wasn’t as wide and so did not need much reining in.

Greyscale

Pre-calibration RGB Tracking
Pre-calibration Delta errors
Pre-calibration RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs)
Post-calibration RGB Tracking
Post-calibration Delta errors
Post-calibration RGB tracking and dEs in [Movie] mode

Gamma

Pre-calibrated Gamma tracking in [Movie] mode Post-calibrated Gamma tracking in [Movie] mode
Pre-calibration gamma tracking (2.17) Post-calibration gamma tracking (2.37)

Colour

Post-calibration Colour saturation tracking in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration colour saturation tracking
Post-calibration colour errors in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration colour errors (<3 not appreciable to the eye)
Post-calibration colour checker
Post-calibration Colour Checker Classic test
Post-calibration colour checker errors
Post-calibration Colour Checker Classic errors (<3 not appreciable to the eye)

Benchmark Test Results

Dead pixels None
Backlight uniformity Some reducible clouding
Overscanning on HDMI Defeatable
Blacker than black Passed
Calibrated black level (black screen) LEDs shut off
Calibrated black level (4×4 ANSI) 0.051 cd/m2
Black level retention Stable if [Smart LED] “Off
Primary chromaticity Excellent
Scaling Excellent
Video mode deinterlacing Very effective jaggies reduction
Film mode deinterlacing Passed 2:2 PAL & 3:2 NTSC tests in SD & HD
Viewing angle Typical of VA-type LCD panel
Motion resolution 1080 lines or higher with [Auto Motion Plus] engaged
Digital noise reduction Optional; effective when engaged
Sharpness Defeatable edge enhancement
Luma/Chroma bandwidth (2D Blu-ray) Full Luma; Chroma vertically softened
1080p/24 capability No judder in 2D; forced interpolation in 3D
Measured panel refresh rate 120Hz
Input lag (Leo Bodnar tester) 21ms in [Game] mode
Full 4:4:4 reproduction (PC) Yes for both 1920×1080 and 3840×2160@60Hz

Power Consumption

Default [Standard] mode 80 watts*
Calibrated [Movie] mode 60 watts
Standby <1 watt

*Note: [Eco Sensor] was enabled by default in [Standard] mode.

Picture Performance

Black Level & Contrast

After pegging peak white to 120 cd/m2 as we always do on our TV review samples, the VA-type LCD panel on the Samsung UE48JU7500 yielded a native black level of 0.057 cd/m2 as measured on a full-field video black screen (with auto-dimming defeated by displaying a pause icon from our OPPO Blu-ray player) and a 4×4 ANSI chequerboard pattern. This is a touch brighter than the higher-end SUHD TVs whose more efficient transmittance granted by quantum dots delivered slightly deeper blacks.

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure indicating PVA LCD matrix

Of course, black-level response on the Samsung JU7500 can be further improved by enabling its pseudo-local dimming system. Besides “Off“, three [Smart LED] settings are offered, namely “Low“, “Standard” and “High“. All three intensities lowered measured black level to 0.013 cd/m2 on a full-black screen, and 0.051 (“Low” and “Standard“) to 0.053 cd/m2 (“High“) on 4×4 ANSI.

Backlight & Screen Uniformity

Most curved LED-lit televisions suffer from backlight unevenness to a certain extent (presumably as a consequence of the stress applied to the LCD panel during the warping process), and the Samsung 48JU7500 was no different, exhibiting several patches of clouding predominantly near the edges of the screen.

More impressive was the UE48JU7500’s screen uniformity, helped perhaps by its likely direct LED underpinning. We ran various shades of full-field grey patterns on the 4K TV, and detected no visible banding; nor did we witness any significant dirty screen effect (DSE) in panning shots during live football broadcast. There’s some half-inch-wide darkening along the borders of the screen creating a minor “vignetting” effect, but it’s only noticeable against a tonally uniform backdrop, and even then it didn’t bother us in real-life viewing.

Motion

We really like Samsung’s black frame insertion (BFI) technology on the Korean brand’s TVs over the past couple of years due to the motion sharpness it brings without introducing interpolation artefacts or soap opera effect (SOE), but we found the implementation less appealing on the JU7500 compared with the step-up JS9500 and JS9000 series for two reasons.

First, the UE-48JU7500 didn’t go as bright as the SUHD televisions in terms of peak luminance: with both [Backlight] and [Contrast] cranked to max, our Klein K10-A meter returned a reading of 140 cd/m2 on full-field white (whereas it was 240 cd/m2 on the quantum-dot-enhanced UE65JS9500). Whilst this level of brightness is perfectly adequate for critical viewing in a dimly-lit room, it may not cut it in a brighter, sun-filled environment (we’re talking with BFI on).

Also, we noticed some microstutter in video-based 1080i50 content from the internal Freeview HD tuner, which didn’t clear up despite experimenting with various settings including [Film Mode]. Motion hiccup following scene cuts still reared its head from time to time, but its frequency and severity was drastically reduced compared with 2013 and 2014 Samsungs.

HD & 4K

Apart from restricted viewing angle which is typical of the VA LCD panel used, we had no complaints about the post-calibrated image on the Samsung UE-48JU7500. Provided we didn’t sit off-axis, blacks appeared convincingly deep without compromising shadow detail, while colours took on a lush yet never unrealistic hue. Upscaling quality was extremely high: well-mastered 1080p Blu-rays naturally looked excellent; and the 4K TV even made a fair fist of standard-definition programmes, preventing them from looking overly shabby, which is no mean feat considering the number of pixels that have to be artificially filled.

Football

The 48″ JU7500 fully resolved all 3840 vertical and 2160 horizontal single-pixel lines from our DVDO AVLab TPG 4K pattern generator at 24Hz, 30Hz, 50Hz and 60Hz, but truth be told, the Ultra HD resolution didn’t offer as much impact on this screen size versus a larger one from normal viewing distances. 4:4:4 chroma can be obtained by labelling the HDMI input as [PC], and enabling [HDMI UHD Color] for that specific port.

3D

The Samsung UE48JU7500 doesn’t ship with any 3D glasses, which is hardly surprising given that even the flagship JS9500 UHD television received a similar treatment – it’s very clear that tri-dimensional functionality is simply not a priority for the company. Nevertheless, we assessed the TV’s 3-D performance using compatible active-shutter glasses we had at our disposal: output resolution was gloriously full HD 3D, but there’s forced interpolation in 3D mode, so 3D Blu-ray films and Sky 3D movies would take on an unnatural, over-smoothed look. In other words, there are better alternatives to Samsung’s offerings if you’re a big fan of extra-dimensional material.

Gaming

Watch out Sony, Samsung is going after the “best gaming TV” crown you’ve comfortably held since 2013. The 48in JU7500 delivered the lowest input lag we’ve recorded yet from a 4K Ultra HD TV, coming in at 21ms according to our Leo Bodnar tester device.

Input lag

Owners who care about full 4:4:4 chroma reproduction when playing PC games will also be pleased to know that input lag in [PC] mode measured an acceptable 36ms. [Movie] mode returned a much higher figure of 119ms. For gamers who demand both better gaming responsiveness and sharper motion, Sony Bravias still have the edge since [LED Clear Motion] is greyed out in either [Game] or [PC] mode on the Samsung UE48JU7500 (although realistically we still think Sony’s BFI system is generally too dim to be usable).

Conclusion

We deliberated long and hard when the time came to assign a final rating for the Samsung UE48JU7500: with wide colour gamut (WCG) and high dynamic range (HDR) dominating the next phase of UHD TV development, should we penalise the JU7500 for not being as future-proofed as its SUHD cousins? At the end of the day though, there’s no agreed standard for HDR just yet, and the 48JU7500 does put out an utterly compelling picture on-axis, with highlights being its uber-low input lag and surprisingly good screen uniformity.

Highly Recommended

28 comments

  1. Hi.
    Is this tv any better than the samsung hu7500 from last year?
    Mfg.

  2. Thank you for the review.

    (1) When you compare this model to the JS9000 (not to mention the 9500), is the JS9000 worth the price difference?

    (2) Also, what do you think when factoring in that you could get a 75” JU7500 for a bit more money than a 65” JS9000?

    (3) In game mode, where you able to spot any picture quality drawbacks?

    Regards,

  3. How about sound quality? Is it better than HU7500 from last year?

  4. Would you be able to share the picture settings, specifically for game mode (6500k)?? That would be much appreciate !

  5. What’s the motion resolution in game mode?

  6. @Micha: Only improvement is input lag. Also bear in mind that last year’s HU7500 is flat, while the new JU7500 is curved.

    @Josep Maria: Depends on how much value you place on HDR playback support however little content there is at the moment – the JS9000 can do it, the JU7500 can’t.

    At a similar price, I’ll always get the larger screen size.

    I’ve described the PQ compromises with [Game] mode in my JS9000 review:

    http://hdtvtest.co.uk/news/ue65js9000-201503154027.htm

    @Paul: Probably similar… didn’t really find it exceptional.

    @Angelsx: 300 lines, since [Auto Motion Plus] cannot be enabled in [Game] mode.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  7. Thank you for the review. Please post a pic of the back of TV… My desk doesn’t face a wall, so I need it to look presentable.

  8. Does this one have a PWM dimmed backlight? I gave up on my last LED backlit TV and went back to the CCFL one because of the PWM and that it also was inexlicably dimming it on dark scenes even with all the dynamic contrast options turned off.

  9. Nice to see that you emphasize on the viewing angle “problem”. *thumbs up*

  10. Vincent Teoh (and the rest if hdtvtest crew)>>
    I have a suggestion for you guys. “Calibrated black level (black screen)” is totally pointless now days and even in the past it sometimes gave you the wrong impression about the display black level/contrast performance. Throw it away.

    “Calibrated black level (4×4 ANSI)” is good for checking the panel native CR but sometimes (when dimming features is used) the APL is too high too tell us something about contrast performance in low APL scenes. We need something to complement it with.

    I would suggest that you replace “Calibrated black level (black screen)” with a new parameter, “Calibrated black level (low APL screen)”. Use one of the APL Test patterns from Avs709.
    (this one: http://i57.tinypic.com/v45h50.jpg)

    That would give us a more accurate measurement of how the display actually works in low APL scenes.

    You could, for fun, also complement the parameters with “ANSI Checkerboard contrast (4×4 ANSI)” and “Maximum contrast (low APL screen). Its always nice to have some XXXX:1 numbers in there… :)

    One more thing, regarding viewing angles problems, would it be possible (without making the test too time consuming) to measure contrast/gamma/color off-axis? I don’t know, from maybe 20 or 30 degrees? That would, I think, really show the advantage OLED and IPS has over VA.

  11. Under what conditions/modes does this “motion hiccup following scene cuts” happen?

    What’s the mode with 21ms of input lag?

    Are the “PC” mode’s 36ms of lag the same both when sending 1080p and 2160p?

    What sort of scaling method is used in PC mode when sending 1080p? Is it blurry bilinear filtering or a simple sharp mapping of each 1080p pixel to 2×2 in the native resolution? Is there a way to choose the scaling method?

  12. Can you tell what is the Motion Resolution without “Auto Motion Plus” engaged?

  13. @Rick: Yes, it’s PWM-driven, but there’s no unwanted dimming on our sample once it has been calibrated.

    @T: Thanks for the suggestions, we’ll take them into consideration.

    @NoLCD: Motion hiccups occur when there’s a frame cut involving a change in speed, for example from a slow-mo replay back to the fast live action.

    21ms was achieved in [Game] mode.

    Our lag tester device was only capable of sending 1080p signal.

    We didn’t check that, but there’s no way to select the type of scaling in [PC] mode.

    @Pedro: 300.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  14. Thanks Vincent.

    Do these hiccups occur on any HDMI input, even when all motion interpolation and image “enhancement” features are off?

    So far the impression I’m getting from a few reviews is that other than somewhat improved input lag, these TVs are actually a step back from last year’s models. Worse blacks, worse uniformity. The 4K resolution isn’t of much use in smaller sizes such as 48″.

  15. Does the JU7500 have better picture quality than the 2014 HU9000? Trying to decide between the two.

  16. 2015 tv´s have Tizen. will apps to older tv´s “die” after some times/years and only tizen apps updates to better performerance and new apps only to Tizen tv´s? now you can get hu7505 to very good price but is Tizen worth the higher price in future use?

  17. Anyone knows if the TV is DLNA certified?
    if yes it will read multimedia files from a NAS via lan?

  18. Are you going to do a review of the Samsung UE48JU7000? Or is it very similar to this model?

  19. Thanks for the great review…I’m interested in the 55″ JU7500 model…should I expect to see the same low input lag on the larger screens in this series? Thanks!!!

  20. Will this tv be upgradable with One Connectbox (inputs, processor software) or is it only able to change input sources with MINI OneConnectbox -upgrading future? Is HU7505 a better choice if you want future upgrades with inputs, new smart tv software and new hardware codecs than this years tv JU series?

  21. I was hoping to find picture / calibration settings to help set the tv up, im terrible at trying to find appropiate settings.

  22. Hi Guys !

    Quick question on whether or not i should go UHD right now or wait.

    I have a Plasma Panasonic 50G30 still working perfectly after almost 4 years.

    Now my job proposes me to have a discount on two UHD tv’s :

    UE55JS9000 at €1,752.94 – 250€ from Samsung = 1503 €

    or

    UE55JU7500 at €1,294.91 -150€ from Samsung = 1144 €

    So i’m wondering if i should go for one of these (and which one then ?) or just keep with the Plasma and wait for the OLED in a few years ?

    I’m also in love with the way Plasma makes everything so realistic and beautiful. Not sure on how 4K works with 720p tv shows.

    Thanks everyone !

  23. Avs forum has this TV playing true HDR clips of life of pi and exodus….. If you have this set, the forum has links to the clips….this might be my next set because of this!
    Von’s hiber

  24. A correction to your review: you say that all 4 HDMI ports are HDCP 2.2 capable. According to page 36 of the Samsung manual : ‘HDCP 2.2 is supported only by the TV’s HDMI (MHL) port.’

  25. Hi,, Thank you for amaizing review .
    1- this tv with 48 inch can see real 4K ??
    2-this model support 3d with 4K ??

  26. I have recently purchased this tv on ur expert recommendation. I m writing this reveiw from india and would like to caution all buyers before going for its purchase. I have connected it through my tata sky hd box. The video quality was pathetic. It was very blur no clear picture. So i have contacted samadubg care. They reccomended some setting but the result was in vain. Have tried all recommended setting online but no use. My sony 48inch 2 yrs old model was giving far better quality picture and sound.
    Kindly contact for any clarification.
    Anurag agarwal
    +918009688898
    India

  27. I asked about samsung ju7500 if can i upgrade it as smart evolution kit in the future with mini connect and how ,at least this version ju7500 better than f7500 & hu7500,and what about quality of sound compare to hu7500

  28. This UltraHD TV don’t have SCART socket.How can i connect my dvd recorder in this tv without a scart connection??

calibration

Professional TV Calibration Service

Own this (or any other) TV? Want to get the best picture quality? Book us in to calibrate your set. Affordable price... get a quote now.

Close