Samsung UE55HU6900 4K TV Review

Prices of 4K Ultra HD TVs have come down quite significantly since they hit the market some 18 months ago, and in the UK you won’t find many cheaper than Samsung’s HU6900 range of ultra high-definition (UHD) televisions. It’s available in three screen sizes, namely the 40-inch Samsung UE40HU6900, the 50-inch UE50HU6900 and the 55-inch UE55HU6900. Even as believers that 4K resolution is perceptible versus 1080p at normal viewing distances, we think such a high pixel count will probably be wasted on a 40-incher, so we’re reviewing the largest model which commands a street price of £1500 at this time of writing.

Samsung UE55HU6900

Of course, a few features have to be trimmed to achieve this price, so it comes as no surprise that the UE55HU6900 doesn’t offer any 3D capabilities. Also, the TV’s motion is rated at CMR (Clear Motion Rate) 200 which is lower than any non-entry-level Samsungs in recent memory – by comparison, the step-up HU7500 and HU8500 UHD series boast CMR of 1000 and 1200 respectively. Let’s crack on and see how this translates to real-world image quality.

Design

Unsurprisingly given its budget status, the 55HU6900’s styling is relatively low-key, what with its black bezel and brushed metallic edging. The bottom right of the screen holds probably the most conspicuous LED indicator we’ve ever seen on a flat-screen television, which may prove distracting in a dimly-lit viewing environment. Unfortunately we couldn’t find a way to turn it off permanently during our brief time spent with the set.

Pedestal stand and remote controls

The trapezoidal base of the table-top stand is two-toned, largely made up of black plastic instead of the full metal body found on the higher-end Samsung UE55HU7500 and UE55HU8500. The front of the base retains the brushed metallic silver finish, as well as the “UHD” inscription.

Inspected from the sides, the panel isn’t slim, which together with some LEDs that are located far away from the edges (visible through the rear vents) suggests direct LED underpinning. Build quality is acceptable – we’ve encountered much flimsier TVs in our lifetime.

Connections

Unlike the HU7500 and HU8500, the Samsung HU6900 doesn’t have a fan near its connection ports, and so is silent in operation. We noticed that navigating the user menu did become sluggish once 4K content was displayed, but thankfully there’s no adverse effect on picture performance. There’s also a socket which can be connected to a later version of Samsung’s One Connect box to upgrade certain aspects of the UHD TV.

Rear connections
Rear: 4x HDMI, 3x USB, component, RGB Scart, aerial, LAN, headphone & audio outs

Calibration

Using Samsung’s comprehensive array of picture-affecting controls and CalMAN 5, the industry-leading video calibration software, we calibrated our UE55HU6900UXXU review unit in [Movie] mode to excellent effect, with greyscale and colour delta errors (dEs) reduced to less than 2 (3 is considered the cutoff before inaccuracies become visible to the human eye).

Greyscale

Pre-calibration RGB Tracking
Pre-calibration Delta errors
Pre-calibration RGB tracking and delta errors (dEs)
Post-calibration RGB Tracking
Post-calibration Delta errors
Post-calibration RGB tracking and dEs in [Movie] mode

Gamma

Pre-calibrated Gamma tracking in [Movie] mode Post-calibrated Gamma tracking in [Movie] mode
Pre-calibration gamma tracking (2.26) Post-calibration gamma tracking (2.37)

Colour

Post-calibration Colour saturation tracking in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration colour saturation tracking
Post-calibration colour errors in [Movie] mode
Post-calibration colour errors (<3 not appreciable to the eye)

Benchmark Test Results

Dead pixels None (not easy to spot at 4K resolution anyway)
Screen uniformity Very good
Overscanning on HDMI 0% with [Picture Size] set to “Screen Fit
Blacker than black Passed
Calibrated black level (black screen) 0 cd/m2 (LEDs shut off)
Calibrated black level (ANSI checkerboard) 0.053 cd/m2
Black level retention Auto-dimming with full black screen
Primary chromaticity Excellent
Scaling Excellent
Video mode deinterlacing Very effective jaggies reduction
Film mode deinterlacing Passed 3:2 over 480i with [Film Mode] engaged
Viewing angle Decent – blacks & colours wash out beyond 40° off-axis
Motion resolution 300
Digital noise reduction Optional; effective when engaged
Sharpness Defeatable edge enhancement
Luma/Chroma bandwidth (2D Blu-ray) Full Luma; Chroma vertically softened
1080p/24 capability Mild telecine judder
Input lag (high-speed camera) 31ms compared to lag-free CRT in [PC] mode
Leo Bodnar input lag tester [PC] mode 40ms; [Game] mode 46ms; [Movie] 57ms
Full 4:4:4 reproduction (PC) Yes, with [PC] input label

Power Consumption

Default [Standard] mode 45 watts*
Calibrated [Movie] mode 103 watts
Standby 1 watt

*Note: Out of the box, [Eco Sensor] is enabled by default in [Standard] mode, which explains why energy usage was much lower before calibration than after.

Picture Quality

After calibration and fixing peak white luminance to our specified target of 120 cd/m2, native black level on the Samsung UE55HU6900 measured 0.053 cd/m2, which seems to be par for the course for a VA-type 4K LCD panel this year. The HU6900 is not equipped with pseudo-local dimming technology so there’s little else you can do to improve the black-level response, but it’s not that big a loss since we consider 0.05 cd/m2 to be good enough by LED LCD standards.

Even better, not having any sort of local dimming on board frees the UHD TV of black level fluctuation (save for the LEDs switching off on a full-black screen): the buried alive scene in Kill Bill Vol 2 didn’t trip up the UE-55HU6900 as it did on the more expensive 55HU7500 and 55HU8500. Backlight uniformity was as good as we’ve observed on an LCD display, with no evidence of clouding or corner bleeding when we examined the panel in a dark room.

Motion was where the UE55HU6900 fell apart. With stills and slow-moving images, things appeared pristine, vibrant and sharply detailed, thanks to the TV’s accomplished upscaling and post-calibrated ability to render deep blacks, smooth gamma without undue tonal jumps, and supremely accurate colours. Yet when there’s medium-fast pans, the on-screen picture degraded into a blurry mess.

Here’s the thing: being a basic model with important features stripped, the Samsung HU6900 provides no way of boosting motion resolution beyond the baseline LCD level of 300 (as determined via the horizontally scrolling lines test card in Chapter 31 of the FPD Benchmark Software disc). The included [Motion Plus] interpolator merely applied dejudder (causing soap opera effect) but not deblur processing – in fact, this is the first time we’ve seen the [Blur Reduction] option missing from the [Motion Plus] “Custom” submenu on a Samsung television. [LED Clear Motion], which on other 2014 Samsung TVs amounted to a highly effective black frame insertion (BFI) system, only darkened the 55HU6900’s image slightly without improving motion clarity.

[Motion Plus] Custom

To be fair, the motion blur was not any worse than what you’d expect from a stock LCD display. But when you put together a perfect storm of largish screen size, super-high resolution and a not insignificant price premium compared with regular HDTVs, then the lack of functional motion interpolation becomes difficult to swallow. The UHDTV’s 4K resolution only holds true on a static picture; on a moving image you’d be lucky to get 1K. On a positive note, the less advanced motion processing seemed to have rid the HU6900 of any motion hiccup which has plagued Samsung’s high-end TVs over the past couple of years.

The UE55HU6900 doesn’t support native 24fps playback, which means that Blu-ray movies will display with subtle telecine judder. If you’re very sensitive to even the mildest stutter, then try setting [Judder Reduction] to “4” to smooth out the judder, though be warned that this will introduce minor soap opera effect and the occasional interpolation artefacts.

While we had no trouble accessing Netflix 4K streaming on the step-up HU7500 and HU8500 series, we couldn’t do so on our UE-55HU6900 sample. For starters, there wasn’t even a Netflix app to be found within the TV’s Smart Hub portal despite running on the most up-to-date firmware version 1001 at time of publication. Otherwise, ultra high-definition content looked glorious, although the aforementioned motion blurring did sour our enjoyment somewhat. Using a 4K test pattern generator, we confirmed that the Samsung HU6900 accepted and displayed 3840×2160 resolution at 50Hz and 60Hz.

Update 11 June 2014: Samsung has sent word that the Netflix app (including Netflix 4K) is now operational on the HU6900 series, although we’re unable to verify this ourselves since we no longer have access to a review sample.

Verdict

The Samsung UE55HU6900 is a case of you get what you pay for. Yes it’s 4K, but only when the picture on screen is mostly still. Once the camera starts panning, resolution drops away quite noticeably, and unfortunately there’s no motion-enhancing technology available on the set to reduce blurring.

The television is not without its virtues: contrast performance was good by LED LCD standards; input lag was low for an Ultra HD TV; plus greyscale, gamma and colour accuracy were top-notch after calibration. But we’re not entirely convinced the 55in HU6900 is the best choice on which to spend £1500, especially considering its lack of native 24p playback and Netflix 4K streaming. Buy it only if you’re going to view 4K photos most of the time.

Note: If you’re interested in buying this TV, please support us by considering making your purchase from our advertising partner Hills Sound & Vision – call 01273 411698 for competitive prices and first-rate service.

Qualified Recommendation

42 comments

  1. Gutted after reading this review. I really thought this tv would be just a good display without the frills like 3d. Hopefully a software update could help resolve the motion issue.

  2. Not too concerned about the lack of de-blur Motion Plus functionality since this is one of the first things I turn off but no native 24p playback is a big no-no for me. I had high hopes for this set as well but guess I’ll stick with full HD for my next set, much better value at this point in time with the lack of 4k content.

  3. I still want this set…..

  4. I bought it.. But will I regret this?

  5. Bought it through ibood for 989. Seemed like a good deal at the time of purchase but not sure anymore after reading this review. Should I keep or cancel my order and get proper full hd tv… decisions decisions decisions

  6. In the colour space assessment can HDTVTEST provides tests based on UHDTV standard (Rec. 2020) rather than the old HD standard?

    One of the key features in UHDTV is enhancement in colour rendering. This HU6900 TV is likely (unproven yet) using the “Green 4k (RGBW)” panels supplied by AUO. The colour rendering performance could be significantly poor when compared with Sony X9 or Samsung HU8500.

  7. @H Batt: None of the consumer 4K TVs, including the Sony X9 and Samsung HU8500, can fulfil Rec. 2020 colour space. No native 4K content uses it currently either.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  8. I can confirm having bought this set that not only does the Netflix app now come in the latest firmware, the ue55hu6900 handles the Netflix 4K stream beautifully.

    Additionally, it handles my naitive 24fps bluray playback fine.

    I’m extremely pleased with this set and at less than half the price of its bigger Samsung brothers, it should seriously be considered.

  9. @Matt D: Thanks for letting us know.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  10. Thanks very much for the review. I’m guessing I’m not real sensitive to the motion enhancing issues, as it looks okay to me (and no, I’m no benchmark). I would be really interested to try the calibration settings you have ended up with for this television. Mine has just arrived and needs a bit of correction.

    Is this something you can share?

    Kind Regards

    Simon

  11. Vincent,

    Would you mind letting me know if you found a 10-point gamma adjustment option for this television? With the single gamma adjuster that I’ve found I can’t get the TV even close to even across the 30-90% spectrum (am using a i1 Display Pro and ChromaPure). Colours are bang on, but my ‘greyness’ of my blacks are still there after calibration.

    Thanks for any help you can provide.

  12. @Simon: No, Samsung doesn’t offer 10-point gamma controls on any of its TV, including the HU6900. I didn’t have any problem getting flat gamma on the UE55HU6900 I reviewed. Make sure you’re using [Movie] mode with [Dynamic Contrast], [Black Tone] and [Eco Sensor] all off.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  13. Vincent,

    Did you notice any gray clouding at near the edge of the bezel on your test unit? I have the HU7000 in Asia, which is equivalent to the HU6900. It’s visible especially during bright scenes and mostly at the top and bottom edge.

    Thanks!

  14. Comparing this with the Sony W905 — which in the same size is roughly the same price right now at Costco — which would be better? The Sony apparently has better motion handling and (edge) local dimming, but both of those apparently have severe side effects and are not recommended. I’m wondering if those settings would actually help me, as I’ve only ever noticed blur in gaming (where the motion features are restricted and generally useless).

    If you turn those settings off, would the black levels and blurriness be about the same on these two choices?

    If so, then the 4K would probably tempt me, but I can’t seem to find that info anywhere — in store the Samsung shows the amazing-looking 4K demo and it looks far superior, but it’s all just slow motion pans of photos and not exactly action movie material.

  15. Hello,

    I bought this TV set today. I want to calibrate it but I do not have the equipment and budget for. Could you share your calibration setings please?

    Thank you in advance,

    François

  16. I have a question. I have read on AnandTech that this TV does not support 4:4:4 at 4k and 60Hz. Yet you say it does. Did you measure it at 30Hz?

    I know it won’t do 4:4:4 at 4k@60 using current hdmi 1.4 graphics cards but once an active adaptor for DP1.2 to HDMI2.0 comes out can i get it running at 4:4:4 at 4k@60?

  17. Our 4:4:4 testing wasn’t done in 4k@60Hz. Anandtech is right.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  18. Thank you very much for the reply. Guess i’ll have to wait or got the monitor way. You should include the resolution and refresh rate at which the tests are done. A tv user might not care all that much but those of us looking to use a tv as a monitor would very much appreciate it.

  19. ” Even as believers that 4K resolution is perceptible versus 1080p at normal viewing distances, we think such a high pixel count will probably be wasted on a 40-incher”

    This makes me question everything else said in the review…. wasted? jesus

  20. stephen cowling

    After playing around with this Tv for some time, and after several updates from Samsung firmware 1006,
    everything on this Tv seems to be of very good value for money inc netflix in 4k, £1199 at time
    of writing for a 55″.

    Motion problems seem to occur when digital noise reduction and mpeg noise reduction are on, if these are turned off and motion plus is set to off the problem seems to go away.
    The best setting i found for this tv seem to match the best setting for the Samsung HU8550
    and can be found on tweaktv.com.

  21. Does it play 3D?
    Active or pasive glasses ?
    Thank u

  22. @David: No it doesn’t play 3D.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  23. tv reviewed 23 may,what have updates from samsung change this tv? what different features has been improved- for example better motion resolution? or is it hardware limited ?here in sweden you can find it at nice price-buy??

  24. Hi Vincent – baring in mind that the 40″ is now available at around £500 – would you consider this a better buy than a none 4K TV at around the same price (or cheaper)?

    We currently have a Philips 32″ which is around 6 years old so presume this would be a huge improvement?

  25. @dp: Yes, £500 is a very good price.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  26. Hi

    Is ist maybe possible that you post the screen settings after your calibration ????

    Would be a great help ….. thx in advance

    Andreas

  27. Hello Vincent.

    Just got the Samsung UE55HU6900.

    I have noticed on the box that this TV says it upscales HD into 4K.

    Does the TV do this automatically or is there a setting for this ?

    Thanks.

  28. @Nic: The TV does it automatically. By definition any sub-4K content would have to be upscaled to be displayed on a 4K screen.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  29. Hello Vincent.

    Thank you for your response.

    I have 1 more question please.

    I have noticed that when the Digital Clean View is set to ON the picture is clear but produces a Ghost Effect. When i turn this OFF it removes the Ghosting Effect but the picture becomes Very Grainy.

    Any suggestions please ?

    Thanks.

  30. Hello Vincent,

    Thanks for the informative review.

    Joining the few other above me, could you please post the calibration settings used for you’ve ended up with?

    Thanks!

  31. any changes with motion resolution since test Vincent? new firmwares this summer.
    maybe you can update the test?

  32. I returned my HU8500 and got this 55HU6900.
    The HU8500 had an irritating fan noise audible to about 5m in a quiet room. (the installer indicated they all do that).
    I got the 55HU6900 and enjoy the quiet, without a fan.
    Perfectly happy with the 6900; have no need for 3D.

  33. I currently own the 40 inch version of this tv and let me tell the reviewers there is no pixell loss in the 40 inch version the quality is just the same as the 55 inch versiob

  34. Hello Vincent,

    I read your article and it was interesting for me especially because I was planning to buy the UE55HU7500 which comes at almost twice the price of the UE55HU6900. If 3D isn’t the issue what would be the trade-off between the two? In other terms: what features would justify for this difference in price?

  35. @Pieter: Motion clarity. The UE55HU7500 is equipped with motion-enhancing technologies; the UE55HU6900 isn’t.

    Warmest regards
    Vincent

  36. Hi VIncent. Thanks for the review.I just bought this TV and am actually not unhappy with the motion performance with all enhancement features switched off.

    Please can you post the calibration settings for us? :)

    Rich.

  37. Why are these reviewers leaving out that this tv is hdmi 2.0? And also i wanna find out what 4k videos these guys have been watching because they have said there struggling reviewing netflix and its just become available but they dont have access to a model to look at, i wanna know what 4k videos they have been watching i have a l9ad of 4k videos.and when the camera moves quality stays the same it onpy downgrades when the camera moves stupudly fast

  38. Don’t fully agree that 40″ is too small. Have the 40″ version, and the quality is visible, especially at close up level. Motion at 4K IS a bit of an issue, but by using an AV pass through to HD, the jitter is a lot less. And anyway, there is no 4K broadcasting yet, so big deal. Also, it IS upscaling in real time, so this can be understood.
    As for upscaling from pre-downloaded stuff on the PVR/external Hard disk….. Compared to another HD tv, this one blows the HD one out of the water. Pixelling was terrible in HD, whereas here, it’s quite acceptable.
    Toys galore, it DOES have NETFLIX, and you can even give vocal commands…… So far, I’m happy.

  39. Hi Vincent :-)
    I wonder if you might find the time to reply to a couple of the questions already posed. I have read down all of the comments and am also interested in finding out whether any firmware upgrades have improved the performance of fast moving 4K content. Also, are you able to post the post calibration settings please?

    Thank you loads :-)

    Steve.

  40. Hi , what is the resolution of this set with moving images ?

  41. I don’t get what those motion thingamajigs that this model is missing do in the first place. Do you really need to insert fake frames between the real ones?

    Why not just watch a higher frame rate source then, at least you’d know the extra frames are what they were meant to be instead of some guesstimated blur.

    Are you seeing problems with just 24/25/30p signal or with 50/60p too?

    As far as I’m aware software players on PCs are not using such fake frames, and no one has ever complained. Why is it suddenly needed on TVs?

    “Yes it’s 4K, but only when the picture on screen is mostly still. Once the camera starts panning, resolution drops away quite noticeably, and unfortunately there’s no motion-enhancing technology available on the set to reduce blurring.”
    This statement really confuses me. Are you referring just to its inability to add fake frames to your satisfaction, or does it fail to render actual frames from the source signal in their full resolution?

  42. Hi Vincent,

    +1 for the calibration settings, if it’s possible. Thank you in advance.

calibration

Professional TV Calibration Service

Own this (or any other) TV? Want to get the best picture quality? Book us in to calibrate your set. Affordable price... get a quote now.

Close